On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Tomasz Ganicz <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2013/5/2 David Gerard <[email protected]>: > > On 2 May 2013 04:06, shi zhao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/ > > > > > > As usual, Orlowski is trolling for clicks. Here's the actual text: > > > > http://niaccurshi.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/orphan-works-enterprise-and-regulatory.html > > > > And The Economist POV: > > http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2013/05/orphan-works >
Another, more considered, piece, from Andres Guadamuz: http://www.technollama.co.uk/has-the-uk-abolished-copyright-analysis-of-new-orphan-work-legislation -- Luis Villa Deputy General Counsel Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6810 NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
