I am not sure how feasible this is, so feel free to ignore my comment. That said, it would be nice if a test suite was added at the same time as the reimplementation so that we could make sure it was working and spot regressions. From remember from previous discussion, the current test coverage is fairly low, so it would be nice to cover a new (and not to mention rather important) section. Depending on whether we want the same behaviour as the current one it could also be used to to check that the new implementation is working according to what we want. Though if too much is changed anyways the latter is of course not relevant.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Widelands Developers, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916545 Title: About depending on GGZ packages Status in Widelands: Confirmed Status in “widelands” package in Debian: New Bug description: I noticed a bug report in Debian which basically suggests to drop the GGZ packages because it is unmaintained upstreams. Since Widelands depends on ggz, this of course affects us there (not to mention Debian derivaties like Ubuntu and Linux Mint). I know the ggz dependency has been discussed a bit before, but we should probably figure out what the long-term plan is. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/widelands/+bug/916545/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~widelands-dev Post to : widelands-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~widelands-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
