No, I want my template html files to be as much as possible be valid html, no additional tags which might cause troubles when using a GUI-based HTML editor. One extra attribute (wicket:id) is acceptable. If necessary, these can be added later easily when getting pages from the designer.
Tom On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:42:44 +0200, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Tuesday, April 10, 2007, 6:01:37 PM, you wrote: > >> The wicket website states at the end of the first paragraph "... written >> with plain Java and HTML". IIRC, the <wicket:...> tags do not belong to >> "plain HTML". > > Are you missing the fact that if you switch to Deployment mode or > explicitly call IMarkupSettings.setStripWicketTags(true)[1] then you > won't get those tags in your output? They're there for ease of > debugging in development mode, but they're not required (in the > output). > > /Gwyn > [1] > http://wicket.sourceforge.net/apidocs/wicket/settings/IMarkupSettings.html#setStripWicketTags(boolean) > > >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:27:18 +0200, Igor Vaynberg >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> we like our namespaced tags. they are xhtml compliant and get stripped >>> from >>> final output. so that will stay the default. if you want to hack away >>> the >>> please feel free to do so, but i do not think you will get much in the >>> way >>> of support. >>> >>> -igor -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
