Hi Igor, > yes it states that, and to a very large degree (more then any other framework)
IIRC, Reasonable Server Faces can do that. They only have the one attribute to mark tags. So your statement in braces is false from my point of view. But you might be right for other frameworks which introduce a lot of additional tags in the templates. > but what drives this framework are the facts that we set realistic goals and > come up with practical solutions. What exactly is unrealistic and not practical with pure wicket:id attributes? > these tags act as barriers/markers, they are not components that you attach > to a page. They might act as barriers for not being able to use a GUI html editor... -- Tom Igor Vaynberg schrieb: > yes it states that, and to a very large degree (more then any other > framework) we follow it. but what drives this framework are the facts > that we set realistic goals and come up with practical solutions. we are > not purists. the most practical solution for us is to have these special > tags for markup that is very wicket-specific. these tags act as > barriers/markers, they are not components that you attach to a page. > > -igor ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
