https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-460
i personally find it much uglier then namespaced tags just because it is
much easier to read the markup. but of course if you are using some fancy
gui editor the point is moot.
-igor
On 4/11/07, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so how does markup inheritance look like in RSF?
Please take a look at
http://www2.caret.cam.ac.uk/rsfwiki/Wiki.jsp?page=OuterPageTemplates
> wicket:id is used to denote components, wicket:extend and friends are
NOT
> components.
From my POV, wicket:id is - well, as the name suggests - an ID to mark an
HTML-tag.
> my editor handles them just fine, maybe you need a better one.
I don't have influence on what HTML editor a designer uses.
> but please do
> show me what you think it should look like without the special tags?
I only could provide a Border replacement which only requires wicket:id to
work.
Tom
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
