Hi

How did you build your temp sensor? What is the accuracy?  Very interested
in this case. How about humidity?
Thanks

Op vr 10 jan. 2025 18:09 schreef p q <peterquinn...@gmail.com>:

> I have an Acurite station, different model. The all in one sensor unit
> with the rain, wind, and temp measurement is kind of cool, but it doesn't
> work well, at least for me. I was unable to find a place with clear sky
> overhead for the rain gauge, clear area around it for the wind gauge, and
> in the shade for the thermometer. The solar panel and fan doesn't do
> enough, at least for me in northern California. So, I gave up on the
> thermometer and mounted it on my roof, where the temperatures are easily 10
> degrees warmer than ground level or 5 degrees colder on clear nights.
>
> To deal with this, I've built my own temperature sensor and mounted it
> elsewhere and send the data via wifi and MQTT. I hacked the acurite driver
> to accept this data through overcomplicated means. If I were doing it
> again, I'd use the MQTT drivers that have been developed since I started.
>
> Also, I've also had to replace the rain gauge after 8 years of operation.
> It's become unreliable. We don't get very much rain here, so it might last
> longer someplace where it's not sitting for 9 months without any rain and
> being subject to 115 deg temperatures. I don't fault Acurite for this,
> things wear out.
>
> In terms of the barometer, mine is in the display unit, not the sensor. I
> have no idea how accurate it is. It appears to track my local airport
> pretty well. What matters for me is more changes in pressure than the
> absolute value, so if it's off by a couple of percent, it doesn't bother me.
>
> Good luck with it!
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 8:41 AM Chuck Rhode <charlescurtisrh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Santa Claus brought me a new-in-the-box, really-old-model AcuRite
>> 02064C to replace an Ambient WS2095 that has been in service at least
>> seven years.  Both are USB tethered, so I'm confident about my
>> hardware config, although it's viability remains to be seen.  (The
>> *weectl device* utility DOES NOT support the AcuRite although there is
>> a *weewx* driver.)
>>
>> Both stations are operating.  I've resisted the temptation to try to
>> switch WeeWX to monitoring the AcuRite because there are discrepancies
>> between the readings displayed on the indoor consoles.  I don't know
>> why I expected them to be identical, and I don't know how much
>> precision to expect.  It may well be that the discrepancies are within
>> the limits of accuracy for this class of devices.
>>
>> I report to AWEKAS, CWOP, PWSWeather, WOW, and Wunderground, so I
>> think I ought to exercise some care with my calibration in order not
>> to contribute unnecessarily to public perceptions of Anthropogenic
>> Global Warming (AGW).  In fact I'm motivated to replace the Ambient
>> station because the wind direction sensor failed in Aug 2023.
>>
>> >          reading    Ambient       AcuRite      KSBM
>> > ----------------    ----------    ----------   ---------
>> >     outdoor temp    26.2°F        26°F         26.1°F
>> > outdoor humidity    53%           83%          80%
>> >         pressure    29.24 inHg                 29.84 inHg
>> >        barometer                  29.56 inHg
>>
>> Right now the outdoor temp is the same on a cloudy day, but I've seen
>> the AcuRite 2°F higher and 2°F lower.  It has a small solar panel and
>> is aspirated, so it may be more reliable.  It's just merely possible
>> that its humidity is much more nearly correct, too, because it IS
>> CLOSE to what the Sheboygan, WI, airport is reporting.
>>
>> According to the WeeWX hardware pages, both stations report "pressure"
>> so I assume that the contradiction is in the labeling on their
>> consoles and not in what they think they are measuring.  Again the
>> AcuRite is more nearly correct, according the airport.  Goodness knows
>> how the actual altitude differs but it can't be more than a couple
>> orders of magnitude in feet.
>>
>> ... so my questions are:
>>
>> Q1: Is this level of obsession justified?
>>
>> Q2: Should I attempt any calibration of the AcuRite station?
>>
>> Q3: Or should I just let it fly without providing any smoothing
>> between old and new readings?
>>
>> Q4: Do I need to have youinses change the WeeWX map, or will my
>> station model populate automagically?
>>
>> - --
>> .. Be Seeing You,
>> .. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
>> .. Weather:  https://LacusVeris.com/Wx
>> .. 25° — Wind WSW at 7 mph. Sky overcast; light snow; mist.
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> iF0EARECAB0WIQT+MY/5I/LMPSswTbVg2/xipKOWUgUCZ4FNnQAKCRBg2/xipKOW
>> UkuiAJ434hOrwrf28Y3opzagIUl4MFm0gQCbB+WApkcJSJRg+pCa/Vgu8hiLhHc=
>> =TNQQ
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "weewx-user" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/20250110104101.4d98fbcf%40BigTimber.LacusVeris.com
>> .
>>
>
>
> --
> Peter Quinn
> (415)794-2264
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "weewx-user" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/CAA1SM21R3cYtXeY9_M%3DWmtwWkcwH-OsdWyGmAgRb_9kF9zuJzA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/CAA1SM21R3cYtXeY9_M%3DWmtwWkcwH-OsdWyGmAgRb_9kF9zuJzA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/CAHaYyoJerDaFvfp9yFFgMxP-mMZg%3DeSxeXdTrfRMdT379k0Lpg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to