Sorry to be unclear, between my English and my explantation, even simple situation to explain could come complicated !
Here is screen capture of the recorded data's from Monday : [image: Capture d’écran 2024-12-19 210915.jpg] The beginning of the trace correspond to weewxd running. Then I run weewx as daemon, no data recorded in the database, and no trace. I did this two times (weewxd, weewx, weewxd, weewx) with the same results. Now only weewxd is running without interruption from that third run. I try to find error in the log's, but I see nothing. But perhaps I have not open the good file ! So the driver is capturing data and stored in the database with weewxd, but not with weewx... Le jeudi 19 décembre 2024 à 03:02:33 UTC+1, Robert Turner a écrit : > Are you saying that the data is not stored in the database? I was thinking > that your post was a little unclear. I'm not too sure I can solve that > problem which is strange if the driver is running capturing the data. > > On Monday, December 16, 2024 at 2:02:43 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie Schneider > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I did not found where is coming this issue. And surprisingly when I run >> weewxd, data's are correctly save into the database ! >> Any help will be appreciated ;) ! >> >> >> >> Le dimanche 15 décembre 2024 à 11:49:59 UTC+1, Jean-Marie Schneider a >> écrit : >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Robert I use your Interceptor.py file, and your conf set as you. >>> it is OK for receiving the data's : >>> ~ $ sudo weewxd >>> Using configuration file /etc/weewx/weewx.conf >>> LOOP: 2024-12-15 11:44:09 CET (1734259449) 'altimeter': 'None', >>> 'appTemp': '45.17646502340741', 'barometer': '30.11', 'cloudbase': >>> '454.4292200824276', 'dateTime': '1734259449', 'dewpoint': '47.2', 'ET': >>> 'None', 'heatindex': '46.603', 'humidex': '48.589000630562424', >>> 'inDewpoint': 'None', 'maxSolarRad': '248.1637619033187', 'outHumidity': >>> '99.0', 'outTemp': '47.5', 'pressure': 'None', 'rain': 'None', 'rainRate': >>> '0.0', 'usUnits': '1', 'UV': '0.0', 'windchill': '47.5', 'windDir': '20.0', >>> 'windGust': '4.4', 'windrun': 'None', 'windSpeed': '3.0' >>> LOOP: 2024-12-15 11:45:14 CET (1734259514) 'altimeter': 'None', >>> 'appTemp': '45.90871472340741', 'barometer': '30.11', 'cloudbase': >>> '454.4292200824276', 'dateTime': '1734259514', 'dewpoint': '47.2', 'ET': >>> 'None', 'heatindex': '46.603', 'humidex': '48.589000630562424', >>> 'inDewpoint': 'None', 'maxSolarRad': '249.19217896926534', 'outHumidity': >>> '99.0', 'outTemp': '47.5', 'pressure': 'None', 'rain': '0.0', 'rainRate': >>> '0.0', 'usUnits': '1', 'UV': '0.0', 'windchill': '47.5', 'windDir': '7.0', >>> 'windGust': '3.4', 'windrun': 'None', 'windSpeed': '1.7' >>> >>> Thanks you Robert for this updated file. >>> >>> Now run the daemon, the database is created but not data's are saved. I >>> will search for this issu ! >>> >>> Had a good end of week end ! >>> >>> >>> Le samedi 14 décembre 2024 à 23:36:16 UTC+1, Jean-Marie Schneider a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> Robert, I will try tomorrow, after a good nigh hopefully ! >>>> And I have a doubt about my installation of weewx. Let see tomorrow... >>>> >>>> Le samedi 14 décembre 2024 à 22:16:40 UTC+1, Robert Turner a écrit : >>>> >>>>> This is how my conf is set. >>>>> [Interceptor] >>>>> driver = user.interceptor >>>>> device_type = wu-client >>>>> mode = sniff >>>>> iface = wlan0 >>>>> pcap_filter = src 192.168.5.131 and dst port 80 >>>>> >>>>> Are you using the original interceptor.py or the one I modified? >>>>> On Saturday, December 14, 2024 at 4:04:58 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie >>>>> Schneider wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks you Robert. I try it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have set an AP, and this time I see the flow of data between my >>>>>> station and wunderground.com : >>>>>> 37 130.019998 10.42.0.13 34.232.250.77 HTTP 402 GET >>>>>> /weatherstation/updateweatherstation.php?ID=ISAINT8047&PASSWORD=abc456&dateutc=2024-12-11+18%3A50%3A3&baromin=29.92&tempf=40.7&humidity=86&dewptf=36.7&rainin=0&dailyrainin=0&winddir=267&windspeedmph=3.2&windgustmph=4.9&UV=0&solarRadiation=0 >>>>>> >>>>>> HTTP/1.1 >>>>>> Frame 5: 403 bytes on wire (3224 bits), 403 bytes captured (3224 bits) >>>>>> Ethernet II, Src: BouffaloLab_ab:75:d3 (b8:3d:fb:ab:75:d3), Dst: >>>>>> RaspberryPi_5d:f0:b2 (2c:cf:67:5d:f0:b2) >>>>>> Destination: RaspberryPi_5d:f0:b2 (2c:cf:67:5d:f0:b2) >>>>>> Source: BouffaloLab_ab:75:d3 (b8:3d:fb:ab:75:d3) >>>>>> Type: IPv4 (0x0800) >>>>>> [Stream index: 0] >>>>>> Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 10.42.0.13, Dst: 34.232.250.77 >>>>>> Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 53970, Dst Port: 80, Seq: 1, >>>>>> Ack: 1, Len: 349 >>>>>> Source Port: 53970 >>>>>> Destination Port: 80 >>>>>> >>>>>> I perform a first modification with port setting : >>>>>> >>>>>> [Interceptor] >>>>>> driver = user.interceptor >>>>>> iface = wlan0 >>>>>> port = 53970 >>>>>> pcap_filter = src 10.42.0.13 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Weewxd run, as well weewx, but no data are obtained. I discover that >>>>>> the port is dynamically set (next connexion, it is 53971, and so one. >>>>>> But, if a don't set the port, weewx did not start with the following >>>>>> error : >>>>>> >>>>>> ERROR weewx.engine: Import of driver failed: [Errno 13] Permission >>>>>> non accordée (<class 'PermissionError'>) >>>>>> >>>>>> I read the page of permissions >>>>>> <https://github.com/weewx/weewx/wiki/Understanding-permissions#how-to-fix-network-permissions> >>>>>> and >>>>>> allowing no method seams easy, especially as the port used by my pws is >>>>>> upper than 1024, the simpler will be to listen all the port upper than >>>>>> 1024, or some thing like this. But I have till now not found how to set >>>>>> that filter. Any help will be welcome ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Jean-Marie >>>>>> Le jeudi 12 décembre 2024 à 00:16:27 UTC+1, Robert Turner a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> This version of the interceptor will be able to sniff the WLAN0 in >>>>>>> AP mode. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, December 10, 2024 at 4:22:47 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie >>>>>>> Schneider wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks you for yours answer. >>>>>>>> @vince : I am such of the IP. As already said, turning of the WS >>>>>>>> let the ping without answer. And the four Devolo are recognize by >>>>>>>> Advance >>>>>>>> IP Scanner. They have a different IP than the WS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @Robert : I will learn how to set up an access point, and come back >>>>>>>> with the results. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le mardi 10 décembre 2024 à 03:10:37 UTC+1, Robert Turner a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm not completely sure of your network layout. I believe you >>>>>>>>> can't sniff wifi traffic with just connecting to the same wifi >>>>>>>>> network. >>>>>>>>> Traffic from a device on wifi going to the internet is not >>>>>>>>> rebroadcast to >>>>>>>>> all devices on the wifi. If your device is connected to wifi and it's >>>>>>>>> sending data to the internet it would go through the wifi router to >>>>>>>>> the WAN >>>>>>>>> port of the router. It wouldn't show up on the Wifi network or LAN. >>>>>>>>> You >>>>>>>>> possibly could tap it by mirroring the data on the WAN port. >>>>>>>>> I did do this a little differently with my wifi weather station. I >>>>>>>>> configured the pi to be an access point with its wireless adapter and >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> ethernet port connected to my router. I setup the access point on the >>>>>>>>> pi to >>>>>>>>> route to the ethernet port and connected the weather station to the >>>>>>>>> pi >>>>>>>>> access point. I modified the interceptor to use tcpdump to capture >>>>>>>>> data on >>>>>>>>> the pi wlan0. The modification was necessary because the interceptor >>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>> not able to sniff the wlan0 on the pi when it was in access point >>>>>>>>> mode. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Monday, December 9, 2024 at 3:12:28 PM UTC-5 vince wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Your wireshark sniffer settings have to be incorrect. My wild >>>>>>>>>> guess in the absence of a network diagram showing which address is >>>>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>>>> would be that your Devolo LAN PLC is the source address to WU, not >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> address of the weather station. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, December 9, 2024 at 11:51:34 AM UTC-8 Jean-Marie >>>>>>>>>> Schneider wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have set up a VEVOR 7-in-1 Wi-Fi Weather Station and would >>>>>>>>>>> like to connect it to WeeWX. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I believe that the WeeWX-interceptor could be a solution, or at >>>>>>>>>>> least worth trying! I installed WeeWX and the interceptor without >>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>> issues. Before attempting to connect my station, I want to verify >>>>>>>>>>> the data >>>>>>>>>>> being sent to wunderground.com, where my station transmits its >>>>>>>>>>> data, or at least check if I can see them. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My configuration is as follows: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - The weather station is connected via Wi-Fi to a Devolo >>>>>>>>>>> Wi-Fi network (using Powerline Communication, PLC). >>>>>>>>>>> - The reception is done by the Devolo LAN (through PLC). >>>>>>>>>>> - The Devolo LAN is connected to my router. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> From my computer, which is also connected through the Devolo >>>>>>>>>>> Wi-Fi, I determined the station's IP address using ZeNMAP >>>>>>>>>>> (confirmed by >>>>>>>>>>> powering off the station: when I ping the IP, I get no response >>>>>>>>>>> from the >>>>>>>>>>> station). Using Wireshark, I monitor the flow on the Wi-Fi (wlan0), >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> there is a lot of traffic. I applied a filter for the station's IP >>>>>>>>>>> address, >>>>>>>>>>> but then I observe nothing—no traffic!? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I also scanned the LAN, but still no additional data. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Next, I placed an Ethernet Network Tap between the router and >>>>>>>>>>> the Devolo LAN. I connected a Raspberry Pi to this tap and >>>>>>>>>>> monitored the >>>>>>>>>>> LAN activity using tcpdump, but again, there was nothing related to >>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>> station. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm struggling to understand why! The station's data is visible >>>>>>>>>>> on the Wunderground site, updated every minute. It's not a pigeon >>>>>>>>>>> delivering the data... So, my question is: what am I doing wrong? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/0600d3d8-688d-446b-9dd3-5785b862d6d6n%40googlegroups.com.
