>>> >>> >> >> Talking about history; we have been using WebObjects since 1998. > > Cool. > >> The point is that Apple did not want to stand in the way of something better >> suited. > > lol... because as a company they're just generous at heart when it comes to > setting their technology free ;-) > >> In their opinion, at that time, the WOLips tools WERE ready for the masses, > > Now you've either got this from the horses mouth so to speak or are making it > up. The former makes no sense as it is simply not true (Entity Modeler for > exmaple was no where near ready ... as Mike worked hard on it *after* the > announcement of Apple dropping theirs). Sure it was showing signs of being > the way to go for the future ... that would be closer to making sense.
It was the way I said before; 1) XCode came out, 2) WOLips came out, 3) WOLips was found to be better than XCode by Apple, [two years later] 4) Apple imposed that opinion on the community. Referring to Apple as a horse is not very conductive to fostering good relationship between the community and Apple. > >> as Apple had already been using them internally for a couple of years prior >> to that. > > That little thing called the Java-bridge doing its disappearing act had some > influence on their decision too... :-) > > Look, I hope they do get around to releasing 5.5, 5.6 etc but there's no > denying that there's some internal politics that's slowing things down > considerably. > > with regards, > -- > > Lachlan Deck > Be good to santa, and maybe there will be something under the tree. D/
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
