On a slightly unrelated note, can we update the copyright all over web2py.com and the layout.html that is shipped with newer web2py versions to 2012?
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > On 4 Aug 2012, at 9:04 AM, Rob_McC <mrmccorm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for insight... > > *Q: Where did you see © preferred?* > >Ref: http://www.copyrightauthority.com/copyright-symbol/ > *"However,... always use the number code instead of the symbol code.... > ©"* > (after examining the site, maybe not an authority? :) > > > I think that site is pretty good, but that specific advice is perhaps a > little stale. My rationale for sticking with © is just for > readability—and that's not a terribly strong argument, since it's fairly > clear from context what © must be... > > Comment: > *>Finally, there's a legal argument for leaving it alone. The © date is > the date of first publication, not necessarily the date of the last edit.* > . I know what you mean. I remember Micro$oft using a range of dates on > software (c) Microsoft 1996-2003 > but, as I mentioned, notice is optional (at least in Can and USA) - and > one would have to proof the date of creation if challenged. > > *>I question whether it's worth adding this overhead to every request* > . I think I'll just hard code it, as I hope to have a very busy site > someday. > > > > -- > > > > --
