Thanks for insight... *Q: Where did you see © preferred?* >Ref: http://www.copyrightauthority.com/copyright-symbol/ *"However,... always use the number code instead of the symbol code.... ©"* (after examining the site, maybe not an authority? :)
Comment: *>Finally, there's a legal argument for leaving it alone. The © date is the date of first publication, not necessarily the date of the last edit.* . I know what you mean. I remember Micro$oft using a range of dates on software (c) Microsoft 1996-2003 but, as I mentioned, notice is optional (at least in Can and USA) - and one would have to proof the date of creation if challenged. *>I question whether it's worth adding this overhead to every request* . I think I'll just hard code it, as I hope to have a very busy site someday. Thanks ~Rob > > --
