On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One web2py installation can contain many apps (what web2py calls an > app is what django calls a project) and different apps share nothing > by default. A reusable subset of a web2py app is what we call a web2py > plugin. (loosely speaking a web2py plugin is a Django reusable app). That's helpful. Thank you. > The difference is not just in the terminology. In one web2py instance > you can run as many apps as you like even if they contain different > conflicting version of the same modules. In Django you need distinct > projects, i.e.distinct instances. Heh, it seems that I've had good smell to choose one over another. :-) > Web2py plugins are less structured than Django reusable apps. It is a > relatively new concept and there is not many of them. i When we're on this topic...can we say that component is something like (custom) content-type which can be put on the page and one can use several of such (content-type) blocks on one page? Some CMS-es are fond of inline-editing feature where one can move those blocks around, edit them etc. Personally, I do not find it is required to have it Sincerely, Gour > For example Django+Pinax is loosely equivalent to > web2py+plugin_wiki. I had expected lot from that project, but it looks it is not advancing very rapidly as it was planned. Pinax talk was long ago... Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature