In powerpack I have this:
config.py (application settings)
data.py (all the db definition and menus)
main.py (auth, mail, service, registration settings, etc) (this is
independant of the app)
then I usually do:
mod_clients.py
mod_users.py
mod_someother.py
mod_someother2.py
I have classes like bruno show, but I don't have db definitions in this
classes, instead I have all the db definition in data.py because surely I
have link to another tables.
Then came the plugins:
plugins_xxxx1.py
plugins_xxxx2.py
plugins_xxxx3.py
plugins_xxxx4.py
plugins_zindex.py (here the execution order of plugins)
2011/5/1 Stifan Kristi <steve.van.chris...@gmail.com>
> i'd like your logic bruno, could you explain about the function, please?
> 000_essentials.py = what for?
> 100_authdatabase.py = what for?
> 200_dbmodel.py = what for?
> 300_validators.py = what for?
> 400_utilities.py = what for?
> 500_preload.py = what for?
>
> thank you so much
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> My point of views is that in a simple and smaller app this approach is a
>> good (may be the only) option.
>>
>> I am now running with a different numerical order, using 3 digits
>>
>> 000_essentials.py
>> 100_authdatabase.py
>> 200_dbmodel.py
>> 300_validators.py
>> 400_utilities.py
>> 500_preload.py
>>
>> why? because between every model I have 99 empty spaces if I need to
>> include some new model without the need to rename all the others.
>>
>> But this is a mess if working with a large app, so I tried to create
>> classes and methods as:
>>
>> class mymodel(object):
>> def define_essentials():
>> db = DAL('.....')
>>
>> def define_auth():
>> auth = Auth(db...)
>>
>> def define_model():
>> db.define_table('mytable',Field(....))
>>
>>
>> So I can call mymodel.define_essentials() directly from the controller or
>> another main model, why?
>>
>> Imagine a large app with many models and many objects loaded in memory
>> even if you do not need them.
>>
>> But, I think web2py has a good MVC pattern used for controllers and views,
>> we are talking about how to have the same approach for model files.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bruno Rocha
>> [ About me: http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno ]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:37 AM, pbreit <pbreitenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think either way is fine. In a bigger app, you might separate them out.
>>>
>>> Vinicius, I like that approach.
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
http://martin.tecnodoc.com.ar
