hmmm... I will study the LGPL some more.
On Dec 12, 11:07 pm, Branko Vukelic <bg.bra...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:46 AM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > imported module are distributed with the compiled app (case 1). It is > > not linking if the py or pyc modules are not distributed together > > (case 2). In case 2 the GPL does not apply. Case 1 is not allowed by > > the GPL and that is why have the commercial exception. > > There's an exception clause in LGPL that allows you to do 1 provided > that the vendor makes an explicit offer of source code for the > portions covered by LGPL and explains to the users that the portions > are covered by LGPL in the first place. > > -- > Branko Vukelić > > bg.bra...@gmail.com > stu...@brankovukelic.com > > Check out my blog:http://www.brankovukelic.com/ > Check out my portfolio:http://www.flickr.com/photos/foxbunny/ > Registered Linux user #438078 (http://counter.li.org/) > I hang out on identi.ca:http://identi.ca/foxbunny > > Gimp Brushmakers Guildhttp://bit.ly/gbg-group
