ez-css + jquery-ui It is the only proposed option I actually like.
-Thadeus On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Mengu <whalb...@gmail.com> wrote: > i agree. i actually don't have any problem with jquery-ui since i'm > doing all my js work with jquery. ez-css seems cool yet it's hard to > implement so i'm still for oo-css. :) > > On 15 Mart, 01:16, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: >> I think we should distinguish between a layout css framework (oocss, >> 960, etc. include it) and a content css framework (jquery ui only does >> this). Perhaps we can pick the layout css from one place and the >> content css from jquery. It is important that class names are easy to >> read and we can fit everything in one css file. I do not like to have >> too many css files in the scaffolding app. >> >> On Mar 14, 5:02 pm, johntynan <jgty...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > While I admire and would welcome having the option of using 960 grid >> > templates, Massimo's suggestion of incorporating jquery's themeroller >> > into the welcome app sounds equally interesting. >> >> > I'm not much of a designer, but I value the ideal of a tableless >> > design. I'd be willing to try to free up some time to help implement >> > these ideas over the coming weeks. >> >> > On Mar 14, 4:10 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: >> >> > > Ideally if we could make the welcome app use or at leat friendly >> > > withhttp://jqueryui.com/themeroller/itwouldbe nice. >> >> > > On Mar 13, 9:35 pm, villas <villa...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Mar 13, >> > > 4:05 pm, Mengu <whalb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > > > > i still recommend oocss as css framework. a lot easier, a lot better. >> >> > > > @Aure. >> > > > Sencss. Good styles, but I don't think it helps with the tableless >> > > > layout? >> > > > BlueTrip. Great looking framework, but like Blueprint, it's a >> > > > comprehensive grid-based which is probably best used as a plug-in. >> >> > > > @Mengu. oocss.org >> > > > I haven't had much time to research every option, but I am inclined >> > > > to agree. It seems excellent and I like the fluidity of the formats >> > > > that I looked at. I don't know whether it would be simple enough to >> > > > include with Web2py; it would be a good case if we find it gives >> > > > access to templates. This is probably the kind of thing I would >> > > > personally go for, but is it right everyone else? Who knows! Those >> > > > with a little time and enough interest might wish to also give it a >> > > > quick look and make a brief comment. In any case, I also think it is >> > > > nice to be aware of this project even if it is not right for Web2py. >> > > > Best wishes, D > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
