The packing itself is (almost) a one liner with debhelper, I keep my
own web2py installs in debs. Most of the 'official' packaging effort
is adapting to some guidelines - like the used paths, startup-shutdown
control, logging, dependencies, etc. Web2py, as it is now, is geared
towards self-sufficiency, which is good, but it means a diff will have
to be produced to make it more 'linuxy' to allow inclusion to
mainstream repositories. I can do that for Debian, Ubuntu and Maemo -
other folks will have to deal with RedHat, Fedora, SuSe, etc as I have
no experience with those.

On Dec 3, 6:19 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
> If we had a script that does the packing I can work out the politics.
>
> On Dec 3, 10:42 am, AchipA <attila.cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's not the packaging that is difficult, it's the process of getting
> > the package into a mainstream distribution.
>
> > On Dec 3, 5:09 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > > It is a good idea. I need somebody to help and take the initiative.
>
> > > On Dec 3, 8:59 am, selecta <gr...@delarue-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> > > > with
>
> > > > sudo apt-get install web2py
>
> > > > ...sry for the incomplete post
>
> > > > On Dec 3, 3:58 pm, selecta <gr...@delarue-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> > > > > thinking about it it would be really nice to install web2py with
> > > > > sudo apti
>
> > > > > On Dec 3, 3:40 pm, selecta <gr...@delarue-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> > > > > > one idea to make web2py a little bit more poplular is to find 
> > > > > > somebody
> > > > > > to package it for debian/ubuntu
> > > > > > should not be to hard since it has very moderate dependencies
>
> > > > > >https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Python
> > > > > > should help, but a pro should be better to get w2p packaged
>
> > > > > > I think we should bug some people on launchpad, like starting one of
> > > > > > these "needs packaging" treads and make everybody here push it
>
> > > > > > On Dec 3, 8:05 am, Yarko Tymciurak <resultsinsoftw...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Dec 3, 12:53 am, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > +1 to more comments in code :)
>
> > > > > > > > Didn't some smart programmer guy write that at least 50%, if 
> > > > > > > > not more, of
> > > > > > > > lines of code should be comments describing what the code does 
> > > > > > > > and WHY it
> > > > > > > > does it ?
>
> > > > > > > Yeah - well, Python can be DENSE CODE, so all the more important 
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > write in outline mode, and pick the right, and meaningful names 
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > vars - then you can make self-documenting code, but outline of 
> > > > > > > intent
> > > > > > > is still the most important thing...
>
> > > > > > > > -Thadeus
>
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:46 AM, mdipierro 
> > > > > > > > <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Good occasion to thank all those who have provided 
> > > > > > > > > significant help
> > > > > > > > > with docstrings.
>
> > > > > > > Indeed!  Thanks!
>
> > > > > > > - Yarko

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.


Reply via email to