The problem with IRC is that because of my job I cannot be there often. Moreover even if things gets resolved they are not recorded.
Massimo On Jul 29, 8:54 pm, ceej <cjlaz...@googlemail.com> wrote: > The current topic ishttp://www.web2py.com- enterprise python > framework || Latest version 1.65.7 || need to paste code use > -http://pastie.textmate.org/|| Google Groups > -http://groups.google.com/group/web2py > || To get someone's attention just type their name into the channel/ > room || Don't ask to ask - just ask > > I tried to get everyone who uses the forums to join a while ago, only > a few did. It's a bit hard for me to answer questions there 24/7 as I > have a full time job which a lot of the times I'm doing 18 hour days > for. But when I do have the time and notice a comment I help out the > best I can. None of this stops you guys from helping out in the IRC > chat though :) > > If you need to ask I vital question it's best to post it on the groups > as it gets answered very quickly. > > I also hope more uses start to join the IRC so the channel gets better > and more active. It's the reason I started it :) > > On Jul 29, 8:39 pm, Bottiger <bottig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I agree that the IRC channel is neglected. When I did benchmarks to > > show that the bundled version of flup does not scale for multicore > > machines and that the prefork version should be used, no one said > > anything. When I mentioned it here, no one has bothered to do anything > > about it. And this is still the case. > > > Whoever is controlling the current channel should relinquish command. > > All the links do not work. > > > As a side note, mitsuhiko, the person that was in the channel, is > > Armin Ronacher. He is known for making Jinja and Werkzeug (a > > minimalist web framework along the lines of Pylons), that is probably > > why he is trolling #web2py. > > > On Jul 29, 6:10 pm, __future__ <wrigh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have seen this come up in some other thread about people not using > > > IRC much in this community. Personally, I think this is kind of > > > tragic since I have seen a lot of good information sharing coming out > > > of IRC since I have been using it (since the early 90's). > > > > I might not be able to change the preferred behavior of this group but > > > could whoever is "in charge" of the IRC channel at least make an > > > effort to keep it up to date? The freenode.net channel topic is a > > > joke. Except forwww.web2py.com, *none* of the links work: > > > > Topic for #web2py is:http://www.web2py.com-enterprisepython > > > framework || Latest version 1.64.2 || need to paste code use > > > -http://cj.nu/y > > > || Google Groups -http://cj.nu/u|| To get someone's attention just > > > type their name into the channel/room || Don't ask to ask - just ask > > > || IRC Logs:http://cj.nu/i > > > * Topic for #web2py set by ceej at Thu Jun 18 22:22:46 2009 > > > > The version is still 1.64.2 and as usual, no one is ever talking in > > > there despite quite a few lurkers... Oh except for earlier, I was at > > > work, some Django people came into bash on web2py to the few people > > > who actual were in there trying to get web2py help. > > > > Ignoring the IRC channel might have unexpected consequences because > > > even though the web2py people might not be using it, others certainly > > > are... > > > > __future__ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
