On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:56 PM, mr.freeze <nat...@freezable.com> wrote:
>
> >>I am not an expert, but since I found out about your web2py, I am
> speechless.
>
> That was my reaction too. web2py was the only framework I found that
> let me focus on actual web development and not get bogged down by
> idiosyncratic templating languages and quirks of other people's
> imaginations. It's just a smarter framework. But as Massimo has
> said, web2py would not exist without it's predecessors. Turbogears,
> Django and others forged a path and web2py improved upon that path. I
> would not hesitate to use it for any size project. The limitations
> have more to do with dynamic vs. static language performance IMO.
... which has more to do with what you are doing, and how you plan it -- web
latency is often your biggest bottleneck, and performance is simply not an
issue at all. Where it is, there are ways to combine compiled language
performance only where needed (cython, interface to native code, etc.).
It's not needed very often at all.
... if only you knew how much python runs behind the doors of google - talk
about traffic....
>
>
>
> On Jul 7, 5:16 pm, eric cs <eeri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Wow Massimo him self, that alone is awesome.
> > I am not an expert, but since I found out about your web2py, I am
> > speechless.
> > Looks like so good that must hava a flaw,,,hehehe, you know what I am
> > saying.
> > I bet more people know about it they will quit other frameworks.
> > How does it compare to java's spring and Php's zend in your opinion.
> > Congratulation for this fantastic piece of software.
> > I would like to help anywhere I can if you guys need some, I believe
> > 120% in web2py.
> > Just amazing!!!!!
> > Web2py will make me learn Python!!!
> >
> > On Jul 7, 6:04 pm, eric cs <eeri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Fran thanks for the reply, but about those problems how
> > > rails,zend,django would be diferent.
> > > I understand orm for big sites can be slow, but just that right?
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > > On Jul 7, 5:53 pm, Fran <francisb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Jul 7, 10:36 pm, eric cs <eeri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > I'm just wondering to do big e-commerce sites like
> > > > >www.taget.comorwww.bestbuy.comisn'tweb2pyenough, or does it need
> more maturity?
> >
> > > > I imagine that a serious site like this would have a team behind it
> > > > which may mean you wouldn't get all the benefits of Web2Py:
> > > > * DB folks may not let you do live migrations
> > > > * Web designers will need the full custom forms so will quickly move
> > > > beyond the rapid prototyping benefits of simple {{=form}}
> > > > * You'll have rigorous change control on upgrades to framework so
> > > > won't benefit from rapid codebase development
> >
> > > > Note this isn't a reason against Web2Py for such an
> application...just
> > > > that it's less of a sweet spot for this framework.
> > > > I see no reason why it would actually be a bad idea to use this
> > > > framework though - I imagine that you'll still be able to prototype
> > > > quickly & deliver a fully-working system just a bit later.
> >
> > > > Let us know how you get on :)
> >
> > > > F
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
