On May 8, 1:56 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is great!
> 2 questions:
>
>    - has this been tested with 2.6* (or 2.7 now)  tar / cross 2.5 - 2.6 use?
>     (If tar is the only 2.6* problem, seems eventually we should just fix the
>    2.6 tar module... )

I do not think so but the bug is only in 2.6.1 and not in 2.6.2

>    - what is the reason / purpose for the new extension - if I understand,
>    it is JUST what already exists - *.tgz / *.tar.gz?

Because we do not want the browser to automatically unzip the file
when downloading.

Notice we will also be able to identify a web2py app from its
extension and that will tell us how to handle it.

> Thanks Alvaro for the patch! :-)
>
> - Yarko
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:41 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > Once more I would like to commend Alvaro for his latest patch.
>
> > Now "pack all" and "pack compiled" save in .w2p (i.e. .tar.gz) and
> > applications can be uploaded in .tar (backward compatible), .tar.gz
> > and .w2p.
>
> > Massimo
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to