Thanks for the prompt response Massimo. It doesn't look like we are using the TAG helper for our application but good to know nonetheless.
Cheers. On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 2:42:09 PM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > The only memory leak I am aware of is when one use the TAG helper. It is > fixed in trunk and will be foxed in 2.4.8 but it is not fixed in 2.4.6. I > am not aware of other memory leaks. > > On Tuesday, 4 June 2013 16:22:10 UTC-5, Aurelio Tinio wrote: >> >> Hi Massimo, >> If you don't mind, could you elaborate on what these bugfixes are? >> We've just upgraded our system to use v2.4.6 and trying to assess if it's >> worth it to do the upgrade to v2.4.7 before our launch. Specifically, we've >> noticed a possible memory leak with our deployment and currently >> investigating if this might have been due to our upgrade to v2.4.6 and if >> so, if this bug has been fixed in the latest version. >> >> Thanks, >> Aurelio >> >> On Friday, May 24, 2013 10:56:11 AM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>> >>> I posted web2py 2.4.7. Includes mostly bug fixes. >> >> -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
