Vut why not use the tracker of this very site? I mean, code.google.com does provide issue tracking linked with the SVN....
On Feb 25, 2:51 pm, Paul Eden <benchl...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on a centralized place for documentation. > > I'm undecided on if we should use trac or web2py for this though. > - Trac is a great tool and it's already implemented which are pluses > for it, but using the framework shows a lot of confidence in it. > - Doesn't Django use Trac? > > Paul > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Fran <francisb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 25, 1:38 am, Joe Barnhart <joe.barnh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> One problem is that our docs are too fragmented at present. Perhaps > >> we should undertake a central wiki and bring all of the other content > >> into it. > > > +1 > > >> It could be based on web2py or not, but it should have the standard > >> wiki revision control. I find the current wiki less useful without > >> it. > > > Agreed. > > For me, I find the best integrated tool for Wiki/BugTracker/SCM is > > Trac & you get free project management functionality as well. This > > provides the lowest maintenance overheads ways of running a dev > > project. > > >http://www.klambauer.info/pms.pdf > > "Trac is probably the best tool for managing software projects of any > > size. -> Highly Recommended!" > > My practical experience backs this up... > > > It can also run on the same environment as Web2Py (Apache/WSGI). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
