On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:45 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
> > For a game flash seems more appropriate than javascript. I have seen > many excellent flash games, not many decent javascript games. > I may be mistaken. Flash is richer.... which is why a lot of mobile phones are going to a flash-based ui; > > I have nothing against pyjamas with is an excellent system and I hope > in further integration with web2py. I played w/ pyjamas for a while the other night - seems a bit too coupled to all that goes out to the browser (e.g. CSS, HTML generation)... I wonder how we would use it.... it seems (from the one day playing) like we'd have to unravel it from all (too much) of what it is trying to do. The fundamental concept seems interesting; there may be a way to generate JS that isn't coupled into everything else (perhaps the tutorials were just boasting too much).... but so far my sense is that it's separation of concerns is not clean... > > Massimo > > > > On Dec 23, 10:20 am, don <pil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Massimo: > > > > Why do you prefer pyAMF + Flash to pyjamas? > > > > Thx. > > > > Don. > > > > On Dec 19, 12:48 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > If your game runs in the browser you are much better off using Flash > > > (pyAMF)+web2py, else use Pygame+twisted. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
