Good idea On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:51 PM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> You can do. Not sure if it is any more useful. > > If your upload speed is the limit, you could always just do the > .tar.bz2 src variant, as the others are not the official release. > > Ali > > On 15 April 2015 at 15:43, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ok, I ll create a new RC then. Would you like me to send you a link > before > > posting a vote for preview? > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:41 PM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > > >> Yuri, > >> > >> > 1 - This one is nasty, forgot to remove the logs... We need to fix the > >> > release script to ignore logs... > >> > >> Yes, this would be good to automate so it doesn't get missed in the > future. > >> > >> > 2. Right, but this one is minor I think. > >> > >> Yes, but just something we should probably do. > >> > >> > 3. So, what would be a better name for folder? 0.4.0-RC8? Regarding > >> > artifact name - I think "incubating" is actually part of the project > >> name, > >> > not part of the version. The "alpha" was added following suggestions > in > >> the > >> > mail list. > >> > >> Yes, I think as Dave says that "0.4.0-rc8" is a much clearer folder > name. > >> > >> Also, I would either drop the -alpha, or put it right at the end of the > >> name. > >> > >> Looking at the incubator-general list, the convention definitely seems > >> to be [name]-[version]-incubating. > >> > >> > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201504.mbox/%3CCAMCtmeKen6FpxLL773krEA5xCdAn3ioy0wJdwHcnzkE5bgSCeQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >> > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201504.mbox/%3CCAPm%3DoFAFAbky0k1xwadvY1_M%3D9M%3DJkwgURdUJogP_CFmz9W47Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >> > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201503.mbox/%3CD125F710.ACAA%25gsaha%40hortonworks.com%3E > >> etc. > >> > >> I chose explicitly not to block the release, but if you agree also > >> then creating a new RC is probably best. > >> > >> Ali > >> >
