I think one can infer "alpha" from the version number being 0.4.0, so
I'm not sure we need alpha in the build names. ()
0.4.0-RC8 seems clear to me for the folder name.
Dave
On 15/04/15 14:53, Yuri Z wrote:
Thanks for the comments Ali.
1 - This one is nasty, forgot to remove the logs... We need to fix the
release script to ignore logs...
2. Right, but this one is minor I think.
3. So, what would be a better name for folder? 0.4.0-RC8? Regarding
artifact name - I think "incubating" is actually part of the project name,
not part of the version. The "alpha" was added following suggestions in the
mail list.
Well, I can create a new RC addressing the comments above - it's matter of
minutes (besides uploading it to apache site which takes hours with my
connection). Should we go for this?
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 4:37 PM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
-0
Checked signatures, SHA hashes, simple server run with federation
enabled and checked waves still work, checked the CAPS FILES (CHANGES,
DISCLAIMER, KEYS, LICENSE, README.*, THANKS).
1) Noticed the source release contains a few wiab-server.log.[01]
files that should not be there...
2) CHANGES not updated to mention RC7 - even if nothing beyond the
name changed - which is probably more confusing for end users if not
documented.
3) I agree with Christian that the folder is a bit confusingly named
0.8, when it really means rc8 for 0.4.0. Similarly for the artifact
which is named "[projname]-incubating-[version]-alpha" rather than the
more conventional "[projname]-[version]-incubating". I also don't
think "alpha" deserves to be in the artifact name. Do we intend to
have a 0.4.0-beta and then a 0.4.0? This seems confusing...
Sorry, but we should probably have another RC.
Ali
On 15 April 2015 at 09:21, Dave Ball <w...@glark.co.uk> wrote:
+1
Tested simple local server, sign up, local waves, adding and removing
recipients.
Dave
On 15/04/15 01:08, Ali Lown wrote:
Aah. The closing time for this has snuck up on me. I will test this
out in the morning.
Seems like we could do with a few other people checking it as well
though...
Ali
On 11 April 2015 at 18:25, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
But theactial release won't have the RC8, as it's will be
incubating-0.4.0-alpha
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 3:04 PM Christian Grobmeier
<grobme...@apache.org>
wrote:
I would name it like:
0.4-incubating-RC8
I think this is a more convenient pattern. However for this vote I
think
it's fine. This is more a suggestion for the future.
however I would pass your information on the naming to the IPMC vote -
I guess it might confuse people there too.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015, at 23:31, Yuri Z wrote:
It's release candidate 8 for version 0.4.0 alpha. If you think we
should
name it something else - let me know.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:35 PM Christian Grobmeier
<grobme...@apache.org>
wrote:
+1
However, I am still very confused by the link saying it's 0.8 and
the
artifacts saying it's 0.4.
Are we sure this is what we want? It might pass the IPMC also
because
naming the release is not something which can/should be blocked, but
it
might confuse users.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015, at 21:49, Yuri Z wrote:
RC8 is now available for review.
It's basically RC7 with artifact names fixed to include
"incubating"
Artifacts can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.8-incubating/
(Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha')
The release version will be: 0.4.0-alpha
This is taken from branch (same as RC7)
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.
git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC7
Reminder on what included previous release candidates:
RC6 included:
- Bug Fixes
RC5 included:
- Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration tool for deltas
migration
from file to mongo based store.
- Added client/server profiling.
- Added Atmosphere framework as replacement of Socket.IO.
- Added alternative - Gmail style initials avatars.
- Decreased number of permutations in dev compilation and added GWT
superdev mode.
- Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1.
- Added JDK 7 compatibility.
RC4 included:
- More licensing fixes
- Federation works
- New and updated translations
- And more...
A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES, and
a
list
of changes in CHANGES at the above artifact distribution url, as
well as
being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?)
Action Required:
Test the release and make it works on your environment - at least
standard
configurations. Please go over the source files and make sure they
don't
contain anything that cannot be released under Apache Wave due to
legal
issues.
This vote will close around 0000 GMT 16-th April 2015.
[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but you really should fix....
[ ] -1 Definitely not because...
Thanks
