Yuri, Please know that there’d be no reason (as far as I am aware) that current data would be removed from JIRA/Wiki/etc. It would simply be marked read-only. I don’t know whether it’d be possible to add a forwarding message to the top of such pages.
Upayavira On Tue, Mar 17, 2015, at 05:41 PM, Yuri Z wrote: > I agree that from the point of view of adding to the source/experimenting > - > there's no advantage to staying with Apache. However, there are other > reasons. > 1. Doing a release will signify that the code base is free of legal > issues > and thus encourage adoption of it by other parties, like wiab.pro, > co-meeting, kune etc... > 2. The Apache Wave site and this mailing list had become a known place to > look for the Wave related info. There's no other well established place > like this. The wave-protocol at google code was such place before Apache, > but it isn't now. Establishing a new home will confuse new and old Wave > followers. > 3. Migrating issues from Jira and Wiki will take considerable effort, > again... Probably a lot of info will be just lost. > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:03 PM Tobias Pfeiffer <tgpfeif...@web.de> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I guess this is my first post to this list, even though I am subscribed > > for a year or so know and "following" the discussions here. > > > > The technology in Wave seems quite amazing to me (in particular the > > federation part, which hardly any commercial entity would add to their > > product out of a business interest) and I would love to see the project > > flourish, but – just judging from what I saw here on the mailing list – > > I was always wondering if this project is going anywhere from its > > current state. I don't know the project and its history very well, but > > it seems to me that even *if* it was possible to make a release or > > convince Apache that Wave should stay in the incubator, I don't see how > > overall progress should be made. > > > > My feeling is that moving out of Apache to, say, Github (not > > Sourceforge, though...) can't make anything worse, but it *might* lower > > the barrier to collaboration. > > > > Thanks > > Tobias > > > >
