Ali,

I don't know off any concrete event. But I know for sure it is possible.

Basically, the project would need to find another set of
mentors/champion is it
needed to do with this incubation. I can imagine people may ask what is
the difference from the previous incubation trial.

A project can always request incubation, at any time. However, it only
makes sense if there is a community in the back. 

The strange set of circumstances would be the Wave community, who
decides to give it another try and is willing to do the paperwork.

Regards,

Christian


On Tue, Mar 24, 2015, at 01:46, Ali Lown wrote:
> Christian,
> 
> This seems to be the age-old Wave problem.
> 
> Regarding your last comment, is there any precedent for a project
> leaving Apache and returning at future point - it does seem like a
> strange set of circumstances would be needed to trigger it?
> 
> Ali
> 
> On 23 March 2015 at 14:06, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > if Wave moves out this list, Jira etc will be read only, but available.
> > Same for the current source code.
> >
> > I agree with 1: in the end Apache is a strong brand and also shows that
> > you can rely on a few things.
> >
> > However at this point we know the benefits of Apache, but can this
> > project also fulfill the requirements of ever becoming a proper Apache
> > project? Apache is not here to give protection or brand to a codebase or
> > "sell something". It's here to work with and help communities.
> >
> > The question to ask now is: can Wave have a community? I know the people
> > here, and I agree here is a huge kindness around. I appreciate it. But
> > what's needed is a community who is also willing to invest some amount
> > of time to keep the ball rolling.
> >
> > I am fully aware some people here invested time. But a single person can
> > not drive an Apache project forward.
> >
> > At Apache, everything is around community.
> >
> > I ask: can we ever build up a community around Wave which understands
> > the principles of Apache, can release code and can keep the project
> > alive?
> >
> > I am certain about the first two things; I am not so certain about the
> > last thing. It's really not much activity here for a long time.
> >
> > As others mentioned: Github may lower the barrier. This might be a
> > chance to ramp up a community, then return to Apache.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015, at 18:41, Yuri Z wrote:
> >> I agree that from the point of view of adding to the source/experimenting
> >> -
> >> there's no advantage to staying with Apache. However, there are other
> >> reasons.
> >> 1. Doing a release will signify that the code base is free of legal
> >> issues
> >> and thus encourage adoption of it by other parties, like wiab.pro,
> >> co-meeting, kune etc...
> >> 2. The Apache Wave site and this mailing list had become a known place to
> >> look for the Wave related info. There's no other well established place
> >> like this. The wave-protocol at google code was such place before Apache,
> >> but it isn't now. Establishing a new home will confuse new and old Wave
> >> followers.
> >> 3. Migrating issues from Jira and Wiki will take considerable effort,
> >> again... Probably a lot of info will be just lost.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:03 PM Tobias Pfeiffer <tgpfeif...@web.de>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I guess this is my first post to this list, even though I am subscribed
> >> > for a year or so know and "following" the discussions here.
> >> >
> >> > The technology in Wave seems quite amazing to me (in particular the
> >> > federation part, which hardly any commercial entity would add to their
> >> > product out of a business interest) and I would love to see the project
> >> > flourish, but – just judging from what I saw here on the mailing list –
> >> > I was always wondering if this project is going anywhere from its
> >> > current state. I don't know the project and its history very well, but
> >> > it seems to me that even *if* it was possible to make a release or
> >> > convince Apache that Wave should stay in the incubator, I don't see how
> >> > overall progress should be made.
> >> >
> >> > My feeling is that moving out of Apache to, say, Github (not
> >> > Sourceforge, though...) can't make anything worse, but it *might* lower
> >> > the barrier to collaboration.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Tobias
> >> >
> >> >

Reply via email to