El 16/03/15 a las 08:35, Christian Grobmeier escribió:
> I would like to highlight that retirement does not mean end of life.
>  There is a chance thing will get easier once on GitHub. Don't
> forget, Apache is not only a great community, it's also a set of
> rules, frameworks, restrictions and so on. It's do-able for a bigger
> community. But the Wave community hardly is able to allocate time to
> do that final step with the release. No offense, I know for myself
> how hard it is to allocate time.
>
> In a GitHub environment, Wave would have done that release already
> (or most likely).
>
> I agree, that protocols may have a good place at Apache. But just
> because retirement is not successful​ this time does not mean it's
> not successful another time. If Wave can build up a community, it
> can always come back to incubation.
>
> However my feeling says, you need to make access easier to Wave. This
> means also the full power of pull requests, which we only offer
> partially.

Hi there:

At this moment, I see Apache Wave mainly as a protocol, so IMHO Apache
is a good place for something like this.
So I vote to stay and to avoid the "forking nightmare" of a protocol.

If not, we should find another organization, different than "github".

Meanwhile, I'm close to release a new version of kune with a totally new
user interface:
http://kune.cc
https://github.com/comunes/kune/
I think that kune is a good example of how Wave can be integrated in 3rd
party software. I try to maintain minimal differences with the Apache
Wave code and Wave for us is just some more maven dependencies.

The main goals of Apache Wave and kune are different. I'm trying since
2002 to build collaborative spaces for any kind of project/area (not
just FLOSS projects), like a "social multipurpose github":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org

I started to develop kune in 2007 and using the same
technology/frameworks than Wave, when Google released wave, I just
replaced our non-concurrent editor with Wave. So I'm playing with Wave
code, since the first FedOne release.

For some stats of code, etc:

https://www.openhub.net/p/apache_wave
https://www.openhub.net/p/kune

kune.cc is in production since four years ago hosting 20.000 documents,
90% are waves.

When some developer/contributor arrives to kune, I'll always try to
suggest to start contributing to wave, but til now, people prefer to
talk than to walk (or code).

Sorry for the "ad block", but I think that clarifies my point.

Greetings,

Vicente


Reply via email to