> > wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar It's for run-export.sh and run-import.sh
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, just checking the output of the build. > > I have a "dist" folder with: > > pst.jar > wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar > wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar > > The old guide ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Building+Wave+in+a+Box#) > makes reference to > > waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar > waveinabox-server-0.3.jar > > in a "wave-protocol" directory. Neither the directory or those files exist. > I assume "waveinabox-server-0.3.jar" is now called > "wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar" > But is "waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar" now > "wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar" ? > > > ~~~ > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > On 4 December 2013 21:50, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Might be worth at some point looking into alternatives for multi-language > > support? > > Should be possible without multiplying compile times. > > I'll have to look into it once I am up and running. > > > > ~~~ > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > > > > On 4 December 2013 21:33, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Permutation is not only per browser, it is also per language and I think > >> WIAB supports 4 languages. > >> Anyway, it is very strange it took 4 hours, probably 2 GB is too little, > >> you ll need about 4 GB. > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > 32??? There isnt 32 different browser engines is there :? > >> > My own GWT projects, (using 2.5.1) use 7 at most. (and even that > should > >> go > >> > down in newer versions as Opera phase's out Presto.) > >> > > >> > It wasn't GWT permutations taking the bulk of the time anyway, mind > >> you - > >> > it seemed to mostly be the testing and (strangely) expanding JAR > files. > >> > That was just my perception though. Certainly before it got to > >> > "compile-gwt:" took at least 4 hours. > >> > Would the log help here? > >> > > >> > My machine is a 4200 dual core Amd. Not much ram (2GB), was running > >> chrome > >> > at the same time, but not doing anything intensive. I wouldn't be > >> surprised > >> > if my machine is to blame here, but I cant think why it would be this > >> > different. > >> > --- > >> > Anyway, dinner now, then back to poking at things. > >> > > >> > > >> > ~~~ > >> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >> > > >> > > >> > On 4 December 2013 20:59, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > We have 32 GWT permutations the moment, we used to have only 4... > Some > >> > last > >> > > changes caused this increase... We need to be more cautious about > >> > updating > >> > > GWT client code. > >> > > I tried > >> > > ant clean dist-server compile-gwt test > >> > > It took me about 16 minutes. If you tried the default target which > >> also > >> > > includes running tests then it could take about 6 minutes more. > >> > > So max 21 minutes on 2-core laptop. This is for the full prod build, > >> if > >> > you > >> > > run the server from compiled source with dev GWT setting(only 2 > >> > > permutations) then it takes only a few minutes, or even less. > >> > > > >> > > Basically running wave is simple like: > >> > > > >> > > git clone git://git.apache.org/wave.git wave > >> > > cd wave > >> > > cp server.config.example server.config > >> > > ant dist-server compile-gwt run-server > >> > > Open the browser at http://localhost:9898 > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > > "BUILD SUCCESSFUL > >> > > > > Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds" > >> > > > > >> > > > Err.. it takes ~5 minutes on my dev machine! Is this a single core > >> vm, > >> > > > doing lots of swapping, and with shared io? > >> > > > > >> > > > > Suggestion; > >> > > > > Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything > >> set up > >> > > > > already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be > >> > > unsuitable? > >> > > > > >> > > > I suspect this would be difficult. (And you don't really want to > be > >> in > >> > a > >> > > > VM). > >> > > > > >> > > > > Query: > >> > > > > Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it back > >> ? Or > >> > > is > >> > > > > there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that > doesn't > >> > > > require > >> > > > > handing over personal details to a company? > >> > > > > >> > > > (OpenJDK 1.6 works fine, so...) > >> > > > > >> > > > This is quite difficult to do for the codebase. You would also > need > >> to > >> > > > upgrade all the third-party components. > >> > > > > >> > > > Please continue to provide feedback. > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks. > >> > > > Ali > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
