ah...ok. If someone could give me editing ability's over that getting started guide then. Doesn't sound like I could make it worse at this point ;)
~~~ Thomas & Bertines online review show: http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) On 4 December 2013 22:40, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > The client console does not exist anymore. > It was removed the code base (at least) two years ago. > > Ali > > On 4 December 2013 21:38, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ok, just checking the output of the build. > > > > I have a "dist" folder with: > > > > pst.jar > > wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar > > wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar > > > > The old guide ( > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Building+Wave+in+a+Box# > ) > > makes reference to > > > > waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar > > waveinabox-server-0.3.jar > > > > in a "wave-protocol" directory. Neither the directory or those files > exist. > > I assume "waveinabox-server-0.3.jar" is now called > > "wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar" > > But is "waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar" now > > "wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar" ? > > > > > > ~~~ > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > > > > On 4 December 2013 21:50, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Might be worth at some point looking into alternatives for > multi-language > >> support? > >> Should be possible without multiplying compile times. > >> I'll have to look into it once I am up and running. > >> > >> ~~~ > >> Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >> > >> > >> On 4 December 2013 21:33, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Permutation is not only per browser, it is also per language and I > think > >>> WIAB supports 4 languages. > >>> Anyway, it is very strange it took 4 hours, probably 2 GB is too > little, > >>> you ll need about 4 GB. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > 32??? There isnt 32 different browser engines is there :? > >>> > My own GWT projects, (using 2.5.1) use 7 at most. (and even that > should > >>> go > >>> > down in newer versions as Opera phase's out Presto.) > >>> > > >>> > It wasn't GWT permutations taking the bulk of the time anyway, mind > >>> you - > >>> > it seemed to mostly be the testing and (strangely) expanding JAR > files. > >>> > That was just my perception though. Certainly before it got to > >>> > "compile-gwt:" took at least 4 hours. > >>> > Would the log help here? > >>> > > >>> > My machine is a 4200 dual core Amd. Not much ram (2GB), was running > >>> chrome > >>> > at the same time, but not doing anything intensive. I wouldn't be > >>> surprised > >>> > if my machine is to blame here, but I cant think why it would be this > >>> > different. > >>> > --- > >>> > Anyway, dinner now, then back to poking at things. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > ~~~ > >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On 4 December 2013 20:59, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > We have 32 GWT permutations the moment, we used to have only 4... > Some > >>> > last > >>> > > changes caused this increase... We need to be more cautious about > >>> > updating > >>> > > GWT client code. > >>> > > I tried > >>> > > ant clean dist-server compile-gwt test > >>> > > It took me about 16 minutes. If you tried the default target which > >>> also > >>> > > includes running tests then it could take about 6 minutes more. > >>> > > So max 21 minutes on 2-core laptop. This is for the full prod > build, > >>> if > >>> > you > >>> > > run the server from compiled source with dev GWT setting(only 2 > >>> > > permutations) then it takes only a few minutes, or even less. > >>> > > > >>> > > Basically running wave is simple like: > >>> > > > >>> > > git clone git://git.apache.org/wave.git wave > >>> > > cd wave > >>> > > cp server.config.example server.config > >>> > > ant dist-server compile-gwt run-server > >>> > > Open the browser at http://localhost:9898 > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > > "BUILD SUCCESSFUL > >>> > > > > Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds" > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Err.. it takes ~5 minutes on my dev machine! Is this a single > core > >>> vm, > >>> > > > doing lots of swapping, and with shared io? > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Suggestion; > >>> > > > > Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything > >>> set up > >>> > > > > already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be > >>> > > unsuitable? > >>> > > > > >>> > > > I suspect this would be difficult. (And you don't really want to > be > >>> in > >>> > a > >>> > > > VM). > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Query: > >>> > > > > Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it > back > >>> ? Or > >>> > > is > >>> > > > > there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that > doesn't > >>> > > > require > >>> > > > > handing over personal details to a company? > >>> > > > > >>> > > > (OpenJDK 1.6 works fine, so...) > >>> > > > > >>> > > > This is quite difficult to do for the codebase. You would also > need > >>> to > >>> > > > upgrade all the third-party components. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Please continue to provide feedback. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Thanks. > >>> > > > Ali > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> >
