"BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds" Ok, after giving Oracle my "totally real" address and "totally real" phone number I got JDK6 and now Ant is building just fine. After 5-6 hours its done. (hours? is that normal? my machines not that great but still...)
Suggestion; Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything set up already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be unsuitable? Query: Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it back ? Or is there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that doesn't require handing over personal details to a company? -- If we want to get more people into Wave development, at my experience here is the norm, then these might be significant issues. Possibly more-so then Apache vs Git. Regardless, I'll continue my experiences trying to get started. ho hum. ~~~ Thomas & Bertines online review show: http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) On 2 December 2013 23:25, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > bah...need to sign up to Oracle just to download JDK6 now? seriously >_< > This is the sort of thing that puts people off :-/ > *files it under "do tommorow" > > ~~~ > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > On 2 December 2013 22:10, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ah...no...a fresh download of jdk7 >> I'll downgrade. >> >> ~~~ >> Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> >> >> On 2 December 2013 21:39, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> >>> Are you definitely using jdk6? >>> On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but I'll aim to >>> edit/update >>> > the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" for someone getting >>> > started). >>> > --- >>> > Notes #4: >>> > ant get-third-party is needed before running ant. >>> > --- Stuck #4: >>> > Build error; >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml >>> > check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] Created dir: >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 .log init: >>> > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [mkdir] Created >>> dir: >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created dir: >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir: >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir: >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created dir: >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir: >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created dir: >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir: >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: compile-proto: [javac] >>> > Compiling 12 source files to C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [javac] >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac >>> > hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method should be >>> qualified by >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] >>> > super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ [javac] error: >>> warnings >>> > found and -Werror specified [javac] >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav >>> > eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method should be >>> qualified by >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] >>> > super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); [javac] ^ >>> > ...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ... >>> > >>> > [javac] super.addAll(values, result.removedContributor_); >>> > [javac] ^ >>> > [javac] 1 error >>> > [javac] 40 warnings >>> > >>> > BUILD FAILED >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following error occurred while >>> > executing >>> > this line: >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile failed; see the >>> compiler >>> > error >>> > output for details. >>> > >>> > Total time: 12 seconds >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ~~~ >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >>> > >>> > >>> > On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > I think the most up to date installation guide is the README file - >>> > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Stuck #3: >>> > > > "ANT" >>> > > > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml >>> > > > >>> > > > check-test-dependencies: >>> > > > >>> > > > BUILD FAILED >>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to execute the >>> > > get-third-party >>> > > > targ >>> > > > et to download dependencies required for tests compilation, i.e. >>> ant >>> > > > get-third-p >>> > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > ~~~ >>> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >>> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >>> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > Note #2: >>> > > > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, with a link to the >>> Java >>> > > > > site. (not just JRE). >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Note #3: >>> > > > > Should be clarified that the ANT command doesn't work in XP just >>> by >>> > > > adding >>> > > > > its path to a "ANT" system variable. >>> > > > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already existing PATH >>> system >>> > > > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" directory, the >>> \ant at >>> > > the >>> > > > > end shouldn't be there. >>> > > > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its added ok. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as soon as I have >>> write >>> > > > > permission, although I will post changes first here as well, in >>> case >>> > I >>> > > > have >>> > > > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and Win7 is treated >>> > > > differently) >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > ~~~ >>> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >>> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route (that is the "wave" >>> > > directory >>> > > > >> > rather then the "wave-protocol" one that doesn't exist now? >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> Yes. >>> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> >
