Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but I'll aim to edit/update
the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" for someone getting
started).
---
Notes #4:
ant get-third-party is needed before running ant.
--- Stuck #4:
Build error;
C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml
check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] Created dir:
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to
C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 .log init:
[mkdir] Created dir: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [mkdir] Created dir:
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created dir:
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir:
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir:
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created dir:
C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir:
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created dir:
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir:
C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: compile-proto: [javac]
Compiling 12 source files to C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [javac]
C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac
hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method should be qualified by
type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac]
super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ [javac] error: warnings
found and -Werror specified [javac]
C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav
eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method should be qualified by
type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac]
super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); [javac] ^
...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ...
[javac] super.addAll(values, result.removedContributor_);
[javac] ^
[javac] 1 error
[javac] 40 warnings
BUILD FAILED
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following error occurred while
executing
this line:
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile failed; see the compiler
error
output for details.
Total time: 12 seconds
~~~
Thomas & Bertines online review show:
http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the most up to date installation guide is the README file -
> https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Stuck #3:
> > "ANT"
> > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml
> >
> > check-test-dependencies:
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to execute the
> get-third-party
> > targ
> > et to download dependencies required for tests compilation, i.e. ant
> > get-third-p
> > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ~~~
> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >
> >
> > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Note #2:
> > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, with a link to the Java
> > > site. (not just JRE).
> > >
> > > Note #3:
> > > Should be clarified that the ANT command doesn't work in XP just by
> > adding
> > > its path to a "ANT" system variable.
> > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already existing PATH system
> > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" directory, the \ant at
> the
> > > end shouldn't be there.
> > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its added ok.
> > >
> > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as soon as I have write
> > > permission, although I will post changes first here as well, in case I
> > have
> > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and Win7 is treated
> > differently)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ~~~
> > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route (that is the "wave"
> directory
> > >> > rather then the "wave-protocol" one that doesn't exist now?
> > >>
> > >> Yes.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
