Are you definitely using jdk6? On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but I'll aim to edit/update > the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" for someone getting > started). > --- > Notes #4: > ant get-third-party is needed before running ant. > --- Stuck #4: > Build error; > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml > check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] Created dir: > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 .log init: > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [mkdir] Created dir: > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created dir: > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir: > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir: > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created dir: > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir: > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created dir: > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir: > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: compile-proto: [javac] > Compiling 12 source files to C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [javac] > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac > hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method should be qualified by > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] > super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ [javac] error: warnings > found and -Werror specified [javac] > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav > eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method should be qualified by > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] > super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); [javac] ^ > ...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ... > > [javac] super.addAll(values, result.removedContributor_); > [javac] ^ > [javac] 1 error > [javac] 40 warnings > > BUILD FAILED > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following error occurred while > executing > this line: > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile failed; see the compiler > error > output for details. > > Total time: 12 seconds > > > > > ~~~ > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think the most up to date installation guide is the README file - > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Stuck #3: > > > "ANT" > > > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml > > > > > > check-test-dependencies: > > > > > > BUILD FAILED > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to execute the > > get-third-party > > > targ > > > et to download dependencies required for tests compilation, i.e. ant > > > get-third-p > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~ > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > > > > > > > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Note #2: > > > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, with a link to the Java > > > > site. (not just JRE). > > > > > > > > Note #3: > > > > Should be clarified that the ANT command doesn't work in XP just by > > > adding > > > > its path to a "ANT" system variable. > > > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already existing PATH system > > > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" directory, the \ant at > > the > > > > end shouldn't be there. > > > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its added ok. > > > > > > > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as soon as I have write > > > > permission, although I will post changes first here as well, in case > I > > > have > > > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and Win7 is treated > > > differently) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~ > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route (that is the "wave" > > directory > > > >> > rather then the "wave-protocol" one that doesn't exist now? > > > >> > > > >> Yes. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
