Ryan, Having never used OSGi Event Admin in a project, I can't speak for certain.
A quick Google to see its use suggests the pub/sub model behind them both is the same, so you could say that it is similar. Ali On 18 June 2013 16:13, Ryan Hill <r...@zndx.org> wrote: > Hi Ali, > Without advocating for anything, do you think WaveBus is at all similar to > OSGi Event Admin? Just being curious... > > Thanks, > --Ryan > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >> Yes. >> >> Originally, the WaveBus was how GWave components was split between >> different machines, so had an ethernet-backed implementation and made >> a lot more sense than it does currently. >> >> Now, it is simply a convenient abstraction to inform modules of >> WaveletUpdate and WaveletCommits around the whole server. >> >> On 18 June 2013 14:54, Dave <w...@glark.co.uk> wrote: >> > My understanding is that the Robots API is exposed externally, but >> WaveBus >> > is an internal interface. >> > >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/trunk/src/org/waveprotocol/box/server/waveserver/WaveBus.java >> > >> > Dave >> > >> > >> > On 18/06/13 13:53, John Blossom wrote: >> >> >> >> Thanks for the diagram, Dave, it helps me to visualize Wave's >> components. >> >> >> >> How much is the "wave bus" a reality as opposed to a potential division >> in >> >> programming? That is, in terms of how one binds/opens the bus, does it >> >> really function as an API. >> >> >> >> John Blossom >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Dave <w...@glark.co.uk> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I couldn't find an overview of the various bits of the wiab server, and >> >>> how they plumb together. So from a couple of hours digging into the >> >>> codebase, I knocked up the attached diagram. >> >>> >> >>> I didn't include the Concurrency and Document/Conversation structure, >> as >> >>> I >> >>> suspect these are better visualised differently / separately. >> >>> >> >>> Is there anything inaccurate or that should be added this diagram, and >> is >> >>> it worth including in the wiki? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Dave >> >>> >> > >>
