Apparently yes:
http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14710/is-there-a-way-to-get-an-embed-link-for-a-google-drawing
Rather than hosted externally, I wonder if the source for such
documentation would be better hosted (and owned) by the Apache project
though - maybe alongside the other docs in svn?
I've not seen such documentation within a mindmap before, so I'm not
sure if that really achieves what I was aiming for. Happy to give
anything a try though.
Dave
On 17/06/13 00:28, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro wrote:
As an alternative, do Google Drawings support embedding?
—Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
On Jun 16, 2013 7:21 PM, "Sam Nelson" <so...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
An example of what I was talking about before:
https://rizzoma.com/topic/4f4d5d1aeb337f9307458e1ec8919881/
This can be embedded using:
<iframe width="550" height="550"
src="https://rizzoma.com/embedded/4f4d5d1aeb337f9307458e1ec8919881/";
frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Although the tool is not very advanced, it does allow for easy
collaboration and visibility.
-Sam
Although I haven't tested it myself, there is a mindmap gadget in Rizzoma
(separate from the mindmap view). If that could be used to build this
diagram then Rizzoma already supports anonymous access of public topics,
and can be embedded in an octane, perhaps in the wiki?
Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
It's not totally accurate IMHO. I would prefer some kind of mind map that
can be edited and improved over time.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
+1 to putting on the wiki.
On 16 June 2013 21:07, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) <sten...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't know the accuracy of the image, but I vote for its inclusion
in
the
wiki.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Dave <w...@glark.co.uk> wrote:
and now as a link, rather than attachment:
http://i.imgur.com/gv4qMJY.png
On 16/06/13 17:11, Dave wrote:
I couldn't find an overview of the various bits of the wiab server,
and
how they plumb together. So from a couple of hours digging into the
codebase, I knocked up the attached diagram.
I didn't include the Concurrency and Document/Conversation
structure,
as
I suspect these are better visualised differently / separately.
Is there anything inaccurate or that should be added this diagram,
and
is
it worth including in the wiki?
Dave
--
Saludos,
Bruno González
_______________________________________________
Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com
http://www.stenyak.com
