On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Purely P2P OT is potentially infeasible for collaborations that are
> extremely long live and that have large numbers of collaborators. I
> included some rationale below.
>
> [...]
> Like I said this is an oversimplification. The real scenario is actually
> worse. For better or worse, Wave's algorithm was designed to remove this
> issue.
>
Do you mean wave was designed to remove this issue... by having servers
(instead of P2P)?
In that case, would the problem still persist if the amount of federated
servers (instead of users) involved in concurrently editing the same
document gets large enough?
(e.g. instead of 200 users spread over 5 federated servers, 200 users
spread over 150 federated servers)
--
Saludos,
Bruno González
_______________________________________________
Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com
http://www.stenyak.com
