On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Joseph Gentle <jose...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yep. Similar but better, because using OT we can guarantee eventual
> consistency we don't need conflict markers and there's a bunch of
> edge cases darcs can't handle.
>
> I was under the impression that darcs could handle all edge cases that
even git can't handle (e.g. the 'bug' where merging patch-by-patch in git
can result in different final status, than merging several patches at
once), and actually that darcs had no known edge cases.
Also, you mention that using OT you don't need conflict markers. Does this
mean that OT guarantees no conflicts at all, ever? If so, and this is just
pure curiosity, does this mean that OT could be the ultimate underlying
system to use by distributed version control systems?
--
Saludos,
Bruno González
_______________________________________________
Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com
http://www.stenyak.com
