Please referer to the previous email from Angus posted to the dev list titles "Release Update" on 9/29/12:
------ Hi All, The last review for licensing stuff is up, i'd appreciate it if you all looked at it and pointed out any errors i've made. There's a couple of things going on at once at the moment: -i'm in contact with the libIDN author, who is happy to release the software under the Apache license, which means we can keep using that once a new release comes out -the other two libraries junit and emma both think the best option is to obfuscate the code somehow like ant, if anyone has any experience in doing it speaking up would be greatly appreciated. ------- I don't think we are thinking about obfuscating OUR code. While I don't have the details, it seems like there is some issue with junit and emma in terms of licnsensing that some how obfuscating those libraries jars would solve. From: "Ed - 0x1b, Inc." <w...@0x1b.com> Reply-To: <wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> Date: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:38 PM To: <wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: Releasing... I'm sorry, why is an open source project obfuscating anything? On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Michael MacFadden <michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Angus, > > In regards to obfuscation. You might take a look at ProGuard: > > http://proguard.sourceforge.net/index.html# > > It's an open source obfuscator. > > And yep. I'll help with the final signing. > > ~Michael > > From: Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: <wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> > Date: Sunday, October 21, 2012 12:58 PM > To: <wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Releasing... > > Sorry i'm the hold up. My script that I used to remove the copyright > headers changed all the comments to not being javadocs anymore. I've been > busy lately and haven't had time to fix it. > > The next step is working out how to obfuscate the jars in a couple of the > libraries to make them compatible with the apache licence. If anyone has > any experience in this any help would be greatly appreciated. > > After that it's a matter of getting all the release documentation sorted, > and then signing and packaging everything and I believe Micheal agreed to > be the one to finish off all the signing. We also need to create a release > page. > Thanks > Angus Turner > angusisf...@gmail.com > > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >> Where did we get to on preparing a tet release? Have we got licensing >> headers in order? Does anything else stand in our way? >> >> Thx, >> >> Upayavira >> > > >
