I'm sorry, why is an open source project obfuscating anything?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Michael MacFadden <michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Angus, > > In regards to obfuscation. You might take a look at ProGuard: > > http://proguard.sourceforge.net/index.html# > > It's an open source obfuscator. > > And yep. I'll help with the final signing. > > ~Michael > > From: Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: <wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> > Date: Sunday, October 21, 2012 12:58 PM > To: <wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Releasing... > > Sorry i'm the hold up. My script that I used to remove the copyright > headers changed all the comments to not being javadocs anymore. I've been > busy lately and haven't had time to fix it. > > The next step is working out how to obfuscate the jars in a couple of the > libraries to make them compatible with the apache licence. If anyone has > any experience in this any help would be greatly appreciated. > > After that it's a matter of getting all the release documentation sorted, > and then signing and packaging everything and I believe Micheal agreed to > be the one to finish off all the signing. We also need to create a release > page. > Thanks > Angus Turner > angusisf...@gmail.com > > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >> Where did we get to on preparing a tet release? Have we got licensing >> headers in order? Does anything else stand in our way? >> >> Thx, >> >> Upayavira >> > > >
