Oh cool, seems you are much further on it than me, so I yield to your work. 
Thanks for looking !

The only (ignorant user) comment is about 
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/20756/4/extras/vom/CMakeLists.txt - seems like it 
loses a bit of readability... wonder if there is a way to keep that somehow. 
But then as I said above in the parenthesis :)

--a

> On 19 Jul 2019, at 23:13, Yohan Pipereau (ypiperea) <ypipe...@cisco.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I am working on having cpack-based packages respect vpp packages name format:
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/20756/ .
> 
> The problem comes from add_vpp_packaging rather than vom.
> 
> Yohan
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of Andrew
>> Yourtchenko
>> Sent: vendredi 19 juillet 2019 20:42
>> To: Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
>> <vrpo...@cisco.com>
>> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
>> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu1604 merge job is broken
>> 
>> I reproduced the problem on 16.04, somehow the name is goofed - it has
>> “Linux” in the package name rather than the standard architecture name. I
>> suspect vom isn’t really arch-agnostic, so probably it is not a nice idea to
>> name it this way :-)
>> 
>> Interestingly building on 18.04 the name does contain the architecture but it
>> does look still slightly different from the rest of the packages.
>> 
>> I will dig further on Monday and ping you.
>> 
>> 
>> --a
>> 
>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 10:36, Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON
>> TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) via Lists.Fd.Io <vrpolak=cisco....@lists.fd.io
>> <mailto:vrpolak=cisco....@lists.fd.io> > wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    <image001.gif>
>> 
>>    Paul has already commented [0] on this,
>> 
>>    hopefully my subject draws more attention.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Basically, packagecould does not like the look
>> 
>>    of ubuntu1604 VOM package, leading not only
>> 
>>    to missing VOM package, but also other packages
>> 
>>    unlucky enough to come after VOM in upload order.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    This includes packages such as vpp-plugin-core.
>> 
>>    Funnily enough, CSIT tests using ubuntu1604
>> 
>>    do not really miss that package.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    So, who has the knowledge to fix the VOM package?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Vratko.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    [0] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/20585/#message-1f1876f6_baf3a8c0
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>    Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>> 
>>    View/Reply Online (#13526): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-
>> dev/message/13526
>>    Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/32524787/675608
>>    Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
>>    Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub
>> [ayour...@gmail.com <mailto:ayour...@gmail.com> ]
>>    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> 
> 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13531): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13531
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/32524787/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  • ... Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) via Lists.Fd.Io
    • ... Andrew Yourtchenko
      • ... Yohan Pipereau (ypiperea) via Lists.Fd.Io
        • ... Andrew Yourtchenko
          • ... Yohan Pipereau (ypiperea) via Lists.Fd.Io

Reply via email to