I reproduced the problem on 16.04, somehow the name is goofed - it has “Linux” in the package name rather than the standard architecture name. I suspect vom isn’t really arch-agnostic, so probably it is not a nice idea to name it this way :-)
Interestingly building on 18.04 the name does contain the architecture but it does look still slightly different from the rest of the packages. I will dig further on Monday and ping you. --a > On 19 Jul 2019, at 10:36, Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at > Cisco) via Lists.Fd.Io <vrpolak=cisco....@lists.fd.io> wrote: > > <image001.gif> > Paul has already commented [0] on this, > hopefully my subject draws more attention. > > Basically, packagecould does not like the look > of ubuntu1604 VOM package, leading not only > to missing VOM package, but also other packages > unlucky enough to come after VOM in upload order. > > This includes packages such as vpp-plugin-core. > Funnily enough, CSIT tests using ubuntu1604 > do not really miss that package. > > So, who has the knowledge to fix the VOM package? > > Vratko. > > [0] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/20585/#message-1f1876f6_baf3a8c0 > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > > View/Reply Online (#13526): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13526 > Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/32524787/675608 > Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io > Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [ayour...@gmail.com] > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13529): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13529 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/32524787/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
