Please see my previous email about rebasing to fix the
vpp-verify-master-centos7 failure.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 10/11/2017 7:38 AM, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
I'm can't tell ... I just noticed that this seems to be the real
cause for failure but missed you mentioning it earlier..
Sorry for confusion :)
Klement
Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-11 13:22:57)
Klement,
I did notice it and I pointed that out in my previous email too.
Do you think that's caused by my patch?
Cheers,
Marco
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 10:38 +0000, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
Did you notice this issue?
08:54:52 Removing rpm/SRPMS/
08:54:52 Removing rpm/tmp/
08:54:52 make[2]: Leaving directory
`/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk'
08:54:52 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64.rpm
08:54:53 ########################################
08:54:53 package vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp2.x86_64 (which is newer
than vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64) is already installed
08:54:53 make[1]: *** [install-rpm] Error 2
08:54:53 make[1]: Leaving directory
`/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk'
08:54:53 make: *** [dpdk-install-dev] Error 2
08:54:53 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
Thanks,
Klement
Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-11 12:28:48)
Hi Jan,
Thanks for pointing to the correct TEST failure.
However, what I'd like to mention is that it's literally impossible to get a
build/run through for the past couple of days.
I am not sure if it's just me being unlucky but none of the "-1 Verified" I
get
are due to the patch I submit... :(
Please, if you have 2 spare mins, take a look at this patch https://gerrit.f
d.io
/r/#/c/8733/ and see how many "recheck" I have and all failed.
Cheers,
Marco
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 10:15 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
Hello Marco,
Regarding failure of vpp-csit-verify-virl-master job - the issue is not
the TC
mentioned by you below. "TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with
local
destination address" is also marked as non-critical as it is expected to
fail
now. You can see it in the console log too:
08:00:53 TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with local destination
address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure I... | FAIL |
08:00:53 Traffic script execution failed
08:00:53 ---------------------------------------------------------------
----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
08:01:22 TC03: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with remote destination
address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure ... | PASS |
08:01:22 ---------------------------------------------------------------
----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
08:01:22 Tests.Vpp.Func.Telemetry.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ip6Ipfixbase-Func
::
*IPFIX ipv6 test cases* | PASS |
08:01:22 0 critical tests, 0 passed, 0 failed
08:01:22 3 tests total, 2 passed, 1 failed
=> there is no critical test failure (only critical tests can block the
verification)
The failed test is " Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func .TC01: VPP
policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet":
08:07:42 TC01: VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet :: [Top]
TG=DUT1.
[ WARN ] Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip6.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func -
TC01:
VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet
08:07:42 The VPP PIDs are not equal!
08:07:42 Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9591, '10.30.52.215': 6792}
08:07:42 Test Teardown VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9863, '10.30.52.215':
6792}
08:07:42 Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip6.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func -
TC01:
VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet
08:07:42 The VPP PIDs are not equal!
08:07:42 Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9591, '10.30.52.215': 6792}
08:07:42 Test Teardown VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9863, '10.30.52.215':
6792}
08:07:42 | FAIL |
08:07:42 Teardown failed:
08:07:42 SSHTimeout: Timeout exception.
08:07:42 Current contents of stdout buffer:
08:07:42 Current contents of stderr buffer:
It seems that there was VPP restart during execution of this test.
Regards,
Jan
-----Original Message-----
From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 10:49
To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <jgelety@cisc
o.co
m>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com>
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing
Today I can't get a build +1 Verified.
Different sort of errors and completely random...
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-centos7/7520/console
07:11:39 make[2]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
centos7/dpdk'
07:11:39 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64.rpm
07:11:39 ########################################
07:11:39 package vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp2.x86_64 (which is newer
than
vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64) is already installed
07:11:39 make[1]: *** [install-rpm] Error 2
07:11:39 make[1]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
centos7/dpdk'
07:11:39 make: *** [dpdk-install-dev] Error 2
07:11:39 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/7533/console
08:29:44 08:00:53 TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with local
destination address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure I...
|
FAIL |
08:29:44 08:00:53 Traffic script execution failed
08:29:44
==========================================================================
====
==
08:29:44 Final result of all test
loops:
| FAIL |
08:29:44 1 critical test has failed.
08:29:44
==========================================================================
====
==
- Marco
On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 07:26 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
Hello Marco,
I had a look on the test case log
(https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-v
irl-master/7480/robot/report/log.html) - it's always the best action
you can do to check what test case really caused the failure as there
are some tests expected to fail because of non-fixed issues in VPP -
and failed test is
TEST TC01: Route IPv4 packet through LISP with Bridge Domain setup.
Where no running VPP was detected (no VPP pid returned) during the
test case setup phase.
Regards,
Jan
-----Original Message-----
From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 09:04
To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
<jgel...@cisco.co
m>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com>
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing
Please, take a look at this logs:
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/7480/console
After Ed and yourself mentioned it... maybe the cause of the failure
is linked to this failure instead?
14:32:52 14:11:12 Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip4 Tunnels.Lisp.Eth2P-Ethip4Lisp-
L2Bdbasemaclrn-Func :: *ip4-lispgpe-ip4 encapsulation test
cases* |
FAIL |
14:32:52 14:11:12 1 critical test, 0 passed, 1 failed
14:32:52 14:11:12 1 test total, 0 passed, 1 failed
Cheers,
Marco
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 15:49 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
+ csit-dev
Hello Marco,
The mentioned test case is not responsible for -1 in verification as
this test case is marked as non-critical. Please, provide links to
affected jobs to find which TC is really failing.
Thanks,
Jan
-----Original Message-----
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io
[mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io]
On Behalf Of Ed Kern (ejk)
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 17:07
To: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com>
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing
could you throw me some example jobs?
thanks,
Ed
On Oct 6, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
I have seen this many times these days...
I wonder if it's a infra hiccup or something is really broken?
The "recheck" is becoming the norm to get a clean +1 Verified...
:(
14:32:52 14:00:32 TC04: VPP doesn't send DHCPv4 REQUEST after
OFFER with wrong
XID :: Configure DHCPv4 client on interface to TG. If server |
FAIL
14:32:52 14:00:32 Expected error 'DHCP REQUEST Rx timeout' but got
'Traffic script execution failed'.
Cheers,
Marco
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
