Hi Jan,
Thanks for pointing to the correct TEST failure.
However, what I'd like to mention is that it's literally impossible to get a
build/run through for the past couple of days.
I am not sure if it's just me being unlucky but none of the "-1 Verified" I get
are due to the patch I submit... :(
Please, if you have 2 spare mins, take a look at this patch https://gerrit.fd.io
/r/#/c/8733/ and see how many "recheck" I have and all failed.
Cheers,
Marco
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 10:15 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Hello Marco,
>
> Regarding failure of vpp-csit-verify-virl-master job - the issue is not the TC
> mentioned by you below. "TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with local
> destination address" is also marked as non-critical as it is expected to fail
> now. You can see it in the console log too:
>
> 08:00:53 TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with local destination
> address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure I... | FAIL |
> 08:00:53 Traffic script execution failed
> 08:00:53 -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 08:01:22 TC03: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with remote destination
> address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure ... | PASS |
> 08:01:22 -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 08:01:22 Tests.Vpp.Func.Telemetry.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ip6Ipfixbase-Func ::
> *IPFIX ipv6 test cases* | PASS |
> 08:01:22 0 critical tests, 0 passed, 0 failed
> 08:01:22 3 tests total, 2 passed, 1 failed
>
> => there is no critical test failure (only critical tests can block the
> verification)
>
>
> The failed test is " Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func .TC01: VPP
> policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet":
>
> 08:07:42 TC01: VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet :: [Top]
> TG=DUT1.
> [ WARN ] Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip6.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func - TC01:
> VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet
> 08:07:42 The VPP PIDs are not equal!
> 08:07:42 Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9591, '10.30.52.215': 6792}
> 08:07:42 Test Teardown VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9863, '10.30.52.215': 6792}
> 08:07:42 Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip6.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func - TC01:
> VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet
> 08:07:42 The VPP PIDs are not equal!
> 08:07:42 Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9591, '10.30.52.215': 6792}
> 08:07:42 Test Teardown VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9863, '10.30.52.215': 6792}
> 08:07:42 | FAIL |
> 08:07:42 Teardown failed:
> 08:07:42 SSHTimeout: Timeout exception.
> 08:07:42 Current contents of stdout buffer:
> 08:07:42 Current contents of stderr buffer:
>
> It seems that there was VPP restart during execution of this test.
>
> Regards,
> Jan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 10:49
> To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <jgel...@cisco.co
> m>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com>
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing
>
> Today I can't get a build +1 Verified.
>
> Different sort of errors and completely random...
>
> https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-centos7/7520/console
> 07:11:39 make[2]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> centos7/dpdk'
> 07:11:39 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64.rpm
> 07:11:39 ########################################
> 07:11:39 package vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp2.x86_64 (which is newer than
> vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64) is already installed
> 07:11:39 make[1]: *** [install-rpm] Error 2
> 07:11:39 make[1]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> centos7/dpdk'
> 07:11:39 make: *** [dpdk-install-dev] Error 2
> 07:11:39 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
>
> https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/7533/console
> 08:29:44 08:00:53 TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with local
> destination address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure I... |
> FAIL |
> 08:29:44 08:00:53 Traffic script execution failed
> 08:29:44
> ==============================================================================
> ==
> 08:29:44 Final result of all test
> loops:
>
> | FAIL |
> 08:29:44 1 critical test has failed.
> 08:29:44
> ==============================================================================
> ==
>
>
> - Marco
>
> On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 07:26 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON
> TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> > Hello Marco,
> >
> > I had a look on the test case log
> > (https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-v
> > irl-master/7480/robot/report/log.html) - it's always the best action
> > you can do to check what test case really caused the failure as there
> > are some tests expected to fail because of non-fixed issues in VPP -
> > and failed test is
> >
> > TEST TC01: Route IPv4 packet through LISP with Bridge Domain setup.
> >
> > Where no running VPP was detected (no VPP pid returned) during the
> > test case setup phase.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 09:04
> > To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
> > <jgel...@cisco.co
> > m>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com>
> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io
> > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing
> >
> > Please, take a look at this logs:
> >
> > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/7480/console
> >
> > After Ed and yourself mentioned it... maybe the cause of the failure
> > is linked to this failure instead?
> > 14:32:52 14:11:12 Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip4 Tunnels.Lisp.Eth2P-Ethip4Lisp-
> > L2Bdbasemaclrn-Func :: *ip4-lispgpe-ip4 encapsulation test
> > cases* |
> > FAIL |
> > 14:32:52 14:11:12 1 critical test, 0 passed, 1 failed
> > 14:32:52 14:11:12 1 test total, 0 passed, 1 failed
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Marco
> >
> > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 15:49 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON
> > TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> > > + csit-dev
> > >
> > > Hello Marco,
> > >
> > > The mentioned test case is not responsible for -1 in verification as
> > > this test case is marked as non-critical. Please, provide links to
> > > affected jobs to find which TC is really failing.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io
> > > [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io]
> > > On Behalf Of Ed Kern (ejk)
> > > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 17:07
> > > To: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com>
> > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing
> > >
> > > could you throw me some example jobs?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > Ed
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 6, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I have seen this many times these days...
> > > > I wonder if it's a infra hiccup or something is really broken?
> > > >
> > > > The "recheck" is becoming the norm to get a clean +1 Verified...
> > > > :(
> > > >
> > > > 14:32:52 14:00:32 TC04: VPP doesn't send DHCPv4 REQUEST after
> > > > OFFER with wrong
> > > > XID :: Configure DHCPv4 client on interface to TG. If server |
> > > > FAIL
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > 14:32:52 14:00:32 Expected error 'DHCP REQUEST Rx timeout' but got
> > > > 'Traffic script execution failed'.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Marco
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > vpp-dev mailing list
> > > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > vpp-dev mailing list
> > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> > >
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
