Klement, I did notice it and I pointed that out in my previous email too. Do you think that's caused by my patch?
Cheers, Marco On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 10:38 +0000, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > Did you notice this issue? > > 08:54:52 Removing rpm/SRPMS/ > 08:54:52 Removing rpm/tmp/ > 08:54:52 make[2]: Leaving directory > `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk' > 08:54:52 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64.rpm > 08:54:53 ######################################## > 08:54:53 package vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp2.x86_64 (which is newer > than vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64) is already installed > 08:54:53 make[1]: *** [install-rpm] Error 2 > 08:54:53 make[1]: Leaving directory > `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk' > 08:54:53 make: *** [dpdk-install-dev] Error 2 > 08:54:53 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure > > Thanks, > Klement > > Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-11 12:28:48) > > Hi Jan, > > > > Thanks for pointing to the correct TEST failure. > > However, what I'd like to mention is that it's literally impossible to get a > > build/run through for the past couple of days. > > I am not sure if it's just me being unlucky but none of the "-1 Verified" I > > get > > are due to the patch I submit... :( > > Please, if you have 2 spare mins, take a look at this patch https://gerrit.f > > d.io > > /r/#/c/8733/ and see how many "recheck" I have and all failed. > > > > > > Cheers, > > Marco > > > > On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 10:15 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON > > TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > > > Hello Marco, > > > > > > Regarding failure of vpp-csit-verify-virl-master job - the issue is not > > > the TC > > > mentioned by you below. "TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with > > > local > > > destination address" is also marked as non-critical as it is expected to > > > fail > > > now. You can see it in the console log too: > > > > > > 08:00:53 TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with local destination > > > address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure I... | FAIL | > > > 08:00:53 Traffic script execution failed > > > 08:00:53 --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ---- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > 08:01:22 TC03: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with remote destination > > > address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure ... | PASS | > > > 08:01:22 --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ---- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > 08:01:22 Tests.Vpp.Func.Telemetry.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ip6Ipfixbase-Func > > > :: > > > *IPFIX ipv6 test cases* | PASS | > > > 08:01:22 0 critical tests, 0 passed, 0 failed > > > 08:01:22 3 tests total, 2 passed, 1 failed > > > > > > => there is no critical test failure (only critical tests can block the > > > verification) > > > > > > > > > The failed test is " Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func .TC01: VPP > > > policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet": > > > > > > 08:07:42 TC01: VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet :: [Top] > > > TG=DUT1. > > > [ WARN ] Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip6.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func - > > > TC01: > > > VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet > > > 08:07:42 The VPP PIDs are not equal! > > > 08:07:42 Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9591, '10.30.52.215': 6792} > > > 08:07:42 Test Teardown VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9863, '10.30.52.215': > > > 6792} > > > 08:07:42 Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip6.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func - > > > TC01: > > > VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet > > > 08:07:42 The VPP PIDs are not equal! > > > 08:07:42 Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9591, '10.30.52.215': 6792} > > > 08:07:42 Test Teardown VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9863, '10.30.52.215': > > > 6792} > > > 08:07:42 | FAIL | > > > 08:07:42 Teardown failed: > > > 08:07:42 SSHTimeout: Timeout exception. > > > 08:07:42 Current contents of stdout buffer: > > > 08:07:42 Current contents of stderr buffer: > > > > > > It seems that there was VPP restart during execution of this test. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Jan > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 10:49 > > > To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <jgelety@cisc > > > o.co > > > m>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com> > > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io > > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing > > > > > > Today I can't get a build +1 Verified. > > > > > > Different sort of errors and completely random... > > > > > > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-centos7/7520/console > > > 07:11:39 make[2]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- > > > centos7/dpdk' > > > 07:11:39 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64.rpm > > > 07:11:39 ######################################## > > > 07:11:39 package vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp2.x86_64 (which is newer > > > than > > > vpp-dpdk-devel-17.08-vpp1.x86_64) is already installed > > > 07:11:39 make[1]: *** [install-rpm] Error 2 > > > 07:11:39 make[1]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- > > > centos7/dpdk' > > > 07:11:39 make: *** [dpdk-install-dev] Error 2 > > > 07:11:39 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure > > > > > > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/7533/console > > > 08:29:44 08:00:53 TC02: DUT reports packet flow for traffic with local > > > destination address :: [Top] TG-DUT1-DUT2-TG. [Cfg] On DUT1 configure I... > > > | > > > FAIL | > > > 08:29:44 08:00:53 Traffic script execution failed > > > 08:29:44 > > > ========================================================================== > > > ==== > > > == > > > 08:29:44 Final result of all test > > > loops: > > > > > > > > > | FAIL | > > > 08:29:44 1 critical test has failed. > > > 08:29:44 > > > ========================================================================== > > > ==== > > > == > > > > > > > > > - Marco > > > > > > On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 07:26 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON > > > TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > > > > Hello Marco, > > > > > > > > I had a look on the test case log > > > > (https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-v > > > > irl-master/7480/robot/report/log.html) - it's always the best action > > > > you can do to check what test case really caused the failure as there > > > > are some tests expected to fail because of non-fixed issues in VPP - > > > > and failed test is > > > > > > > > TEST TC01: Route IPv4 packet through LISP with Bridge Domain setup. > > > > > > > > Where no running VPP was detected (no VPP pid returned) during the > > > > test case setup phase. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com] > > > > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 09:04 > > > > To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > > > > <jgel...@cisco.co > > > > m>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com> > > > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io > > > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing > > > > > > > > Please, take a look at this logs: > > > > > > > > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/7480/console > > > > > > > > After Ed and yourself mentioned it... maybe the cause of the failure > > > > is linked to this failure instead? > > > > 14:32:52 14:11:12 Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip4 Tunnels.Lisp.Eth2P-Ethip4Lisp- > > > > L2Bdbasemaclrn-Func :: *ip4-lispgpe-ip4 encapsulation test > > > > cases* | > > > > FAIL | > > > > 14:32:52 14:11:12 1 critical test, 0 passed, 1 failed > > > > 14:32:52 14:11:12 1 test total, 0 passed, 1 failed > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Marco > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 15:49 +0000, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON > > > > TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > > > > > + csit-dev > > > > > > > > > > Hello Marco, > > > > > > > > > > The mentioned test case is not responsible for -1 in verification as > > > > > this test case is marked as non-critical. Please, provide links to > > > > > affected jobs to find which TC is really failing. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io > > > > > [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] > > > > > On Behalf Of Ed Kern (ejk) > > > > > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 17:07 > > > > > To: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> > > > > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > > > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing > > > > > > > > > > could you throw me some example jobs? > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 6, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have seen this many times these days... > > > > > > I wonder if it's a infra hiccup or something is really broken? > > > > > > > > > > > > The "recheck" is becoming the norm to get a clean +1 Verified... > > > > > > :( > > > > > > > > > > > > 14:32:52 14:00:32 TC04: VPP doesn't send DHCPv4 REQUEST after > > > > > > OFFER with wrong > > > > > > XID :: Configure DHCPv4 client on interface to TG. If server | > > > > > > FAIL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 14:32:52 14:00:32 Expected error 'DHCP REQUEST Rx timeout' but got > > > > > > 'Traffic script execution failed'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Marco > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > vpp-dev mailing list > > > > > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > > > > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > vpp-dev mailing list > > > > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > > > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > vpp-dev mailing list > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev _______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
