With my release manager hat on …
Do we consider support for VLAN tags on an AF packet interface a bug fix (to be
back ported) or a new feature (available from 17.10 onwards)?
/neale
-----Original Message-----
From: "prabh...@techtrueup.com" <prabh...@techtrueup.com>
Date: Thursday, 28 September 2017 at 13:07
To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>
Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "John Lo (loj)"
<l...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, Akshaya
Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
yes i verified it on stable/1707 itself.
Regards,
Prabhjot
Quoting "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com>:
> See https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8590. The patch cherry-picked easily
> to stable/1707.
>
> Assuming that the cherry-pick patch validates - and that it solves
> your problem - it will be up to Neale [as the 17.07 release manager]
> whether to merge it or not.
>
> Please let us know whether the cherry-pick patch works for you.
>
> Thanks… Dave
>
> From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io
> [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Prabhjot Singh Sethi
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:27 PM
> To: Akshaya Nadahalli <aksh...@rtbrick.com>; Prabhjot Singh Sethi
> <prabh...@techtrueup.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; John Lo (loj)
> <l...@cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
>
> yes it works perfectly fine with this patch.
> i hope this will be pushed to 17.07 branch as well.
>
> Thanks for the help :)
>
> Regards,
> Prabhjot
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
> "Akshaya Nadahalli" <aksh...@rtbrick.com<mailto:aksh...@rtbrick.com>>
>
> To:
> "Prabhjot Singh Sethi"
> <prabh...@techtrueup.com<mailto:prabh...@techtrueup.com>>,
> <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, "John Lo"
> <l...@cisco.com<mailto:l...@cisco.com>>
> Cc:
>
> Sent:
> Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:18:50 +0530
> Subject:
> Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces
>
>
> Hi Prabhjot,
>
>
>
> Can you pls try with below patch and see if it helps:
>
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8435/
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Akshaya N
>
> On Thursday 28 September 2017 03:45 PM, Prabhjot Singh Sethi wrote:
> trying again with more appropriate subject
>
> Can some one please help if i am missing any thing over here ?
>
> As mentioned earlier, i have interface host-eth10 and sub interface
> host-eth10.10 (create sub host-eth10 10)
> host-eth10 is associated to bridge domain 2 and sub interface is
> associated to bridge domain 3
> when VPP receives tagged packet with vlan 10 it still associates it
> to bd 2 and not bd 3
>
> Note: if i don't associate any bd with base interface it just drops
> the packet with some error.
>
> Regards,
> Prabhjot
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
>
> --
> Regards,
> Akshaya N
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
