My friend, I quoted the original text.  That was the first line in my original 
post. 

Maybe you should get a better email reader before you start accusing people of 
deliberate lies.  The full text was there for everyone to see.  I offered an 
opinion as to what I understand it to mean.  Some offered their opinion.  
Everyone offered their opinion on what they think it means.  Everyone's own 
opinion is a "spin".  Nothing extraordinary or sinister there.

Need I remind you that I have been a big supporter of Rossi and the eCat.  That 
I too, am eagerly awaiting the TIP2 report.  I signed up for a 1 megawatt plant 
and home unit from the earliest days.  


Jojo


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ian Walker 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:13 AM
  Subject: [Vo]:Ignore Jojo Iznart's fairy tales about what e-catworld actually 
said, unless you enjoy being conned.


  Hi all


  In Reply to Jojo Iznart:

  You just love making stuff up. You would have a great future writing for the 
Daily Mail, they write lots of fairy tales too.


  This is what it says in the report Jojo Iznart is referring too in full 
rather than Jojo Iznart's spin

  "Update #17 (August 20, 2014)

  I was able to make contact with one of the people involved in the third party 
test, asking if they could provide any guidance as to the release date of the 
report. The response I received was that they realize there is a great amount 
of interest in the report, but that because of polarized opinions surrounding 
the LENR and E-Cat, it was not advisable to give any pre-statements about the 
content of timing or the report."

  http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/20/e-cat-report-watch-thread/


  always go to the original source to check what I or any one else writes.


  As we can see the real thread says nothing like Jojo Iznart's spin, it seems 
he is a bit of a FUD merchant.

  I wrote this in separate thread so as not to give its false headline any 
attention by writing a reply in that thread.


  Kind Regards walker

Reply via email to