http://phys.org/news/2014-08-debating-science-withtrolls.html
*Chances of it being a Scam has increased.* I have received an education in the tactics many trolls use. These tactics are common not just to trolls but to bloggers, journalists and politicians who attack science, from climate to cancer research. Some techniques are comically simple. Emotionally charged, yet evidence-free, accusations of scams, fraud and cover-ups are common. While they mostly lack credibility, such accusations may be effective at polarising debate and reducing understanding. On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Ian Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > In Reply to Jojo Iznart: > > You just love making stuff up. You would have a great future writing for > the Daily Mail, they write lots of fairy tales too. > > This is what it says in the report Jojo Iznart is referring too in full > rather than Jojo Iznart's spin > > *"Update #17 (August 20, 2014)* > > I was able to make contact with one of the people involved in the third > party test, asking if they could provide any guidance as to the release > date of the report. The response I received was that they realize there is > a great amount of interest in the report, but that because of polarized > opinions surrounding the LENR and E-Cat, it was not advisable to give any > pre-statements about the content of timing or the report." > http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/20/e-cat-report-watch-thread/ > > always go to the original source to check what I or any one else writes. > > As we can see the real thread says nothing like Jojo Iznart's spin, it > seems he is a bit of a FUD merchant. > > I wrote this in separate thread so as not to give its false headline any > attention by writing a reply in that thread. > > Kind Regards walker >
