I don't know who you think the troll is but let me tell you one such technique trolls use.
A Troll will saturate a forum with ridiculous, evidence-free ideas and wear down legitimate challenges to his ideas. We lost an emminent tried-and-true LENR researcher to the unrestrained unbriddled unfounded speculations of a troll. If he can not answer a challenge (a simple one at that), he resorts to this tactic of destroying the challenger instead of answering the challenge. . Then accuses the messenger of "conning" people. How exactly is this conning achieved when the full text of the document is available for everyone to see. This troll seems to think that my opinion has some magical hypnotic power to deceive Vortex people. Such low opinion of the people in Vortex. I provided a link to a report from e-catworld. One is free to offer his understanding of what the report means as Alan Fletcher has done. People disagree on how to interpret the text as Alain has done. A friendly discussion ensues. Where is the conning? Why get personal and accuse people of conning? Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:56 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ignore Jojo Iznart's fairy tales about what e-catworld actually said, unless you enjoy being conned. http://phys.org/news/2014-08-debating-science-withtrolls.html Chances of it being a Scam has increased. I have received an education in the tactics many trolls use. These tactics are common not just to trolls but to bloggers, journalists and politicians who attack science, from climate to cancer research. Some techniques are comically simple. Emotionally charged, yet evidence-free, accusations of scams, fraud and cover-ups are common. While they mostly lack credibility, such accusations may be effective at polarising debate and reducing understanding. On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Ian Walker <[email protected]> wrote: Hi all In Reply to Jojo Iznart: You just love making stuff up. You would have a great future writing for the Daily Mail, they write lots of fairy tales too. This is what it says in the report Jojo Iznart is referring too in full rather than Jojo Iznart's spin "Update #17 (August 20, 2014) I was able to make contact with one of the people involved in the third party test, asking if they could provide any guidance as to the release date of the report. The response I received was that they realize there is a great amount of interest in the report, but that because of polarized opinions surrounding the LENR and E-Cat, it was not advisable to give any pre-statements about the content of timing or the report." http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/20/e-cat-report-watch-thread/ always go to the original source to check what I or any one else writes. As we can see the real thread says nothing like Jojo Iznart's spin, it seems he is a bit of a FUD merchant. I wrote this in separate thread so as not to give its false headline any attention by writing a reply in that thread. Kind Regards walker
