On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:12 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kevin: > > > > Think about these clues: > ***Mark, go down the street to the corner store and purchase a clue. > 1) At this time, noone has indicated that Blaze has taken any of their $. > ***First of all, that's because of me keying up on him and showing him to be the shyster he is. Second of all, you're changing your ragabout requirements because originally you asked had anyone "took him up on a bet???" I did, and he reneged, acting like someone who's targeting a group of true believers in order to fleece them. He basically admitted this. So now that you're backtracking, how far will you backtrack? > I doubt that anyone has even bothered to offer, except you, of course. > Why do you suppose that is? > ***Duhh, it's because I brought it out into the light of day what his agenda was. You're as addlepated as a long tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs. > > > 2) You stated, “***Then WTF are you doing on such a thread where that is > the point of the discussion?” > > Clue#1 implies that the vast majority of Vorts are NOT interested in its > probability of being real. > ***Again, addlepated one: If the "probability of being real" discussion isn't of interest, then why are you showing interest? If it's such a waste of Vort time, why are you wasting your time on it? You should be sending your harangue to the guy who introduced it in the first place: Blaze. But instead you're keying up on the guy who is forcing Blaze's feet to the fire. Perhaps you should purchase 2 clues instead of just one, because you'll no doubt lose the clue you get as soon as you get a clue. > In fact, those who have done their homework are pretty much convinced that > it **IS** real (i.e., probability=1.0, or close to it), so discussing the > probability of it being real is pretty much a waste of time. > ***Yet, we find you wasting your time on it, not bitch-slapping the guy who introduced the timewaste but rather going after his opponent. Maybe there's more than one candidate for a Cephalorectomy here. > > > 3) Given #2, > ***Ridiculous reasoning. #2 is not given. It's full of holes, so you can't say it's "given". > it should be obvious that the MAIN purpose of this discussion group, at > least as far as LENR is concerned, is the SCIENCE, not whether its real or > not. > ***POTO, pointing out the obvious. The last refuge of the scoundrel and the pedant. And yet, the discussion of the probabilities DOES further the science, you just can't see it. > I’m here for the same reason that most Vorts are here, which is to discuss > the SCIENCE; to try to connect the dots... > ***Then discuss the science, key up on the guy who "wastes your time" with his ridiculous probabilities, and stop bothering the guy who went after the scoundrel time-waster. > > > You wrote: > > “… you choose some peripheral waste-of-time bullshit issue to focus on, > rather than the original subject of the thread” > > You might think that how we treat each other is a ‘peripheral > waste-of-time bullshit’ issue, but I, and I would wager most other Vorts, > think that it’s an important issue… > ***Then you, of all people, should appreciate how a person who ADMITS to trying to make money off Vorts, who by your own admission wastes your time, and who mistreats Vorts in other ways, that person should be the object of your wrath. > or, in all your ranting and raving did you forget my whole point which was > to simply ask you to leave out any personal derogatory statements? > ***Perhaps you will be keying up on Jed Rothwell for posting exactly the same personal derogatory statement? > > > If you want to continue to engage Blaze on the topic of wagering on LENR, > knock yourself out, > ***That's part of the annoyance of dealing with this bullshitter, he won't engage on his own topic. > but Blaze has also contributed to discussions on the science of LENR, so > treat him in a civil manner… > ***When Blaze discusses science I treat him with respect. Or have you lost sight of that in your haste to condemn me? Yup, it looks like you lost sight of it. > is that too much to ask? > ***Yes. But at least now I'm having some fun in my interactions with you, so it hasn't been a complete waste of my own time. Have you purchased your 2 clues yet? I hear Blaze is offering bait&switch pricing on clues. Best of luck with that. > > > > >
