I like sincerely Blaze's personal and original interpretation of probability; if Rossi is "real"and/or "useful" is open tp explanations: excess heat,how much, at what cost (COP), manageable going on the markets (which?), safe... many open questions which will receive step-wise (non)answers
Peter On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:12 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> wrote: > Kevin: > > > > Think about these clues: > > 1) At this time, noone has indicated that Blaze has taken any of their > $. I doubt that anyone has even bothered to offer, except you, of course. > Why do you suppose that is? > > > > 2) You stated, “***Then WTF are you doing on such a thread where that is > the point of the discussion?” > > Clue#1 implies that the vast majority of Vorts are NOT interested in its > probability of being real. In fact, those who have done their homework are > pretty much convinced that it **IS** real (i.e., probability=1.0, or > close to it), so discussing the probability of it being real is pretty much > a waste of time. > > > > 3) Given #2, it should be obvious that the MAIN purpose of this > discussion group, at least as far as LENR is concerned, is the SCIENCE, not > whether its real or not. > > I’m here for the same reason that most Vorts are here, which is to discuss > the SCIENCE; to try to connect the dots... > > > > You wrote: > > “… you choose some peripheral waste-of-time bullshit issue to focus on, > rather than the original subject of the thread” > > You might think that how we treat each other is a ‘peripheral > waste-of-time bullshit’ issue, but I, and I would wager most other Vorts, > think that it’s an important issue… or, in all your ranting and raving did > you forget my whole point which was to simply ask you to leave out any > personal derogatory statements? > > > > If you want to continue to engage Blaze on the topic of wagering on LENR, > knock yourself out, but Blaze has also contributed to discussions on the > science of LENR, so treat him in a civil manner… is that too much to ask? > > > > -Mark Iverson > > > > *From:* Kevin O'Malley [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 05, 2014 8:09 PM > > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Swedish Professors Chomping at the Bit > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:22 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> > wrote: > > All Vorts: > > Have any of you lost money to Blaze, or even took him up on a bet??? > > ***Yes. I did. I took him up on his bet immediately when he offered 10:1 > odds, and then he quickly backtracked, citing (insert some favorite > bullshit here) that there had been "news" in the meantime that changed his > mind. There had been ZERO news. The only thing happening in LENR at that > time was that I was schooling him. > > Kevin: > > Perhaps you need to go back and read the rules regarding vortex postings… > > ***Mark: Perhaps you need to "get a clue". If pointing out that Blaze > needs a Cephalorectomy, then you just kicked Jed and others off this > board. Do you really want to do that? > > > > I have no desire to debate probabilities of LENR/Rossi being real… > > ***Then WTF are you doing on such a thread where that is the point of the > discussion? > > it’s a waste of time as far as I’m concerned, and I would guess that most > here feel the same, > > ***But it doesn't stop you from logging onto such a thread. So you've > logged onto a thread that you consider to be a waste of time so that you > don't comment on the subject of the thread but you choose some peripheral > waste-of-time bullshit issue to focus on, rather than the original subject > of the thread. Talk about wasting time. You appear to be professional at > it. > > > since you and Blaze seem to be the only ones who contribute to that > topic... I think it’s you who needs to ‘get a clue’. > > -m > > ***I have the clue, you don't. For instance, why don't you post to Blaze > that you're prepared to take him up on his offer of 40%? So that means you > put $40 down for Blaze to match with $60, to make $100 that will be donated > to a LENR-honorable organization such as MFMP or LENR-CANR.org. For grins, > you can say that "Rossi being real" will be measured by the vote of > vorticians within 10 days of the receipt of the TIP report we all > anticipate. If Vorticians vote that it is a positive for Rossi, then Rossi > Is Real. If Vorticians vote that it is a negative for Rossi, then Rossi is > a scam artist or something else. Let us see how Blaze squirms off that > deal, which is far from the 10:1 odds originally offered with a $5000 pot. > > > > Or is all this stuff a buncha waste-of-time bullshit that a nanny-state > intervener such as yourself would consider to be "below him"? > > > > > > *From:* Kevin O'Malley [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 05, 2014 7:51 AM > > > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Swedish Professors Chomping at the Bit > > > > If Bill wants to beg to differ, let him. It's his sandbox. In the > meantime your free advice is worth what I paid for it. > > If you don't like the implication that Blaze has his head in dark places, > go ahead and defend him from such an ugly onslaught of horrible personal > attacks that you'd invoke the name of the High One. You''re the one trying > to act like the parent here. > > Or perhaps you could spend your time *actually* commenting on the *actual* > subject at hand. After all, that is one of my objections to Blaze on his > *own* thread. > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:17 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> > wrote: > > All here are smart enough to determine for themselves whether or not they > want to part with their $... don’t need you to act like our parent; our > govt does enough of that already. > > I think your interaction with him has been MORE than enough warning to all > Vorts, and, you can still engage him, just don’t imply he’s got his head > in dark places. > > > > >“The "rules" bend under such circumstances.” > > I think Bill B. would beg to differ… you can still ‘warn’ us clueless > idiots if you really feel compelled to do so, just lay off the personal > attacks… its really pretty simple. > > > > -Mark > > > > *From:* Kevin O'Malley [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 04, 2014 10:17 PM > > > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Swedish Professors Chomping at the Bit > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:45 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Kevin, > > Lighten up. > > ***NO. > > Ever since Blaze first showed up, he's been trying to steal money from > your pocket and every other vortician's pocket. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg83682.html > > > He even admits to wanting to take your money. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg93969.html > > The "rules" bend under such circumstances. "Lighten up" becomes "Get a > clue". > > > > > > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
