I like that On Wednesday, June 4, 2014, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
> We're at the magic stage. > > Science, anyone skilled in the art can reproduce it. > > Magic, only some skilled in the art can reproduce it. > > Religion, no one can reproduce it. > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> The Galileo Test cannot be one on the Ni/H reactor. Its design and >> operating principles are top secret. We are at the religion stage currently >> and the builders of the Ni/H reactors want to keep it that way for as long >> as possible. >> >> When asked :"how does it work" the builders will then ask "you tell Me". >> >> LENR is not science, it is top secret project engineering. >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Ian Walker <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> On the matter of scepticism: >>> >>> No one is denying people the right to be scientifically sceptical of >>> LENR but to be a sceptical scientist you must conform to the Galileo Test >>> and put your eye to the telescope. >>> >>> For the radio reporter to speak out against a report that has not been >>> published, is evidence that the reporter is engaged in religion not science. >>> >>> For the radio reporter to further compound this with ad homonym attacks, >>> is further evidence that the reporter is engaged in religion not science. >>> >>> If the radio reporter has read the publication of the first Third Party >>> test report: >>> http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913 >>> >>> and reported on the first set of third party tests and then critiqued it >>> at the time, the reporter did not, as others did and reported it in main >>> stream media as these and others did: >>> >>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/05/20/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all/ >>> >>> >>> http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2013/05/21/the-e-cat-is-back-and-people-are-still-falling-for-it/ >>> >>> >>> http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-05/cold-fusion-machine-gets-third-party-verification-inventor-says >>> >>> Then that critique would apply to that report as part of valid >>> scientific scepticism. The fact that the radio reporter did not report on >>> the paper or critique it on scientific methodological grounds at the time, >>> is evidence that the reporter is engaged in religion not science. >>> >>> Arguing, as the radio reporter is doing, that the second six month Third >>> Party test, dealing with those critiques of the methodology of the first >>> Third Party report should not be published, is to go against the >>> fundamental principles of the scientific method: >>> >>> In order to be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on >>> empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of >>> reasoning. >>> >>> This is the most damning evidence that those involved in the radio >>> report are engaged in religion not science. >>> >>> The Experiment is king. >>> >>> To be scientifically sceptical you must conform to the Galileo Test and >>> put your eye to the telescope. >>> >>> Kind Regards walker >>> >> >> >
