More... http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.0830.pdf
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Nanoplasmonics can explain tritium production as well as helium > production. See > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg83012.html > > > > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Axil, >> >> NAE "traps" seem to exist in many forms. DGT seems to have fabricated >> "magnetic" traps facilitated by Nano-antennae, which is what you are >> referencing. Meulenberg-Sinha in their Extended Lochon elaborate on >> electrostatic traps initiated by phonons emanating from linear defects (or >> "Nano-cracks"). Even in Ed's theory there is a variety of "trap", wherein >> the walls of the NAE become sufficiently loaded with charge so to >> facilitate the formation and "trapping" of Hydroton chains. There is no >> monopoly on "trap" methodology it would appear. >> >> As far as Shoulders goes, again, the EVO does not explain He4 or tritium. >> I think it may contribute to the overall reaction output as a secondary or >> tertiary reaction, and may in fact be the reason we see transmutations with >> no radioactive products. But we have to figure out whether deuterium or >> tritium is produced in NiH before we jump to any real conclusions. >> >> As far as Ed's objection that the EVO is only created in spark discharge >> plasma, Shoulders also speculates EVO in wet-systems is formed through >> sono-luminescent bubble ejections striking the cathode. So I'm not sure >> that objection is all that valid, because theoretically EVO could form in >> standard electrolysis PdD. But again it in no way accounts for He4 or >> tritium in these systems (and neither does hot fracto-fusion account for >> these ash either). >> >> Regards, >> John >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Ken Shoulders has captured the fundament LENR reaction in a experimental >>> picture he took. >>> >>> In more detail, a picture of the dark mode localized magnetic traps >>> (LMT) can be found in the Ken Shoulders paper on Figure 5 and 6 on page >>> 4 sited in this vortex post as follows: >>> >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg80263.html >>> >>> Let us discuss this >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> *I also wonder if you will cover Ken Shoulders discovery of >>>> transmutation in spark production* >>>> >>>> I continue to wonder how EVO factors into LENR, if at all. Shoulders >>>> has observed that for whatever reason his experiments do not produce >>>> radioactive elements, similar to LENR transmutation results. Now >>>> unfortunately, like all vacuum energy hypotheses, EVO does not explain the >>>> Heat/Helium correlation nor tritium production in PdD. Once we know whether >>>> deuterium and tritium are being produced in NiH, we'll be better able to >>>> predict the relevance of EVO in that system. >>>> >>>> I suspect that there are about 3-4 different types of reactions >>>> intermingling in all systems. The main reaction is some kind of cluster >>>> fusion phenomenon that produces the nuclear level excess heat and >>>> dissipates nuclear products slowly through photons and phonons. The >>>> secondary and tertiary phenomenon may include Cavitation, Casmir Forces, >>>> EVO, and/or Fracto-Fusion. All speculation of course. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> John >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> One manifestation of the LENR reaction that your theoretical thinking >>>>> has been very weak on is the explanation of the Rossi reactor meltdown >>>>> when >>>>> high temperature material can melt at temperatures in excess of 2000C. >>>>> >>>>> Will you now attempt to explain how this high heat event can occur, >>>>> and explain the details of how this particular reaction can happen? >>>>> >>>>> I believe that the extremes of a reaction can reveal the detailed >>>>> essence of the reaction. >>>>> >>>>> I also wonder if you will cover Ken Shoulders discovery of >>>>> transmutation in spark production as well as transmutation produced in the >>>>> proton 21 experiment? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Edmund Storms >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Axil, this insight will be provided in a book that will take my first >>>>>> book, written in 2007, to the present and show how the observations have >>>>>> been explained and how they can be better explained without conflict with >>>>>> what is known. Unfortunately, so many different opinions exists in the >>>>>> field, no one would believe what I propose without the complete evidence >>>>>> only a book can provide. >>>>>> >>>>>> Too many attempts at creating a theory are based on pure imagination >>>>>> without any relationship to reality or to what is actually observed. >>>>>> People >>>>>> simply do not read the literature. This is understandable because about >>>>>> 2000 papers must be found and read, which is a full time job. Enough >>>>>> information is now available to make rejection of most theories possible >>>>>> and to identify where the unique mechanism functions in the process. >>>>>> Nothing about the process conflicts with what is known. The unique >>>>>> mechanism is new and I predict the full understanding will warrant a >>>>>> Nobel >>>>>> prize by someone in the distant future. The best analogy to past >>>>>> discoveries would be the realization by Pauli that a neutrino-like >>>>>> particle >>>>>> existed based on how the energy of beta decay was found to be less than >>>>>> the >>>>>> required mass-energy change. Until then, people had no clue such a >>>>>> particle >>>>>> was possible. In the case of LENR, a new force is revealed that is >>>>>> hidden >>>>>> in plain sight in exactly the same way. A person only needs to know >>>>>> where >>>>>> to look. >>>>>> >>>>>> My book will describe my path to a solution. Of course, this will >>>>>> open the door to another rejection event by all the theoreticians and >>>>>> everyone who thinks they know how the effect works. But, then the book >>>>>> will >>>>>> speak for itself without my having to waste time in endless debate. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ed Storms >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 12, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm in the process of studying all the explanations and comparing >>>>>>> them to what is known in LENR and in general science. The failure to >>>>>>> make >>>>>>> progress in explaining LENR is easy to see and a clear path to the >>>>>>> correct >>>>>>> explanation is becoming obvious, at least to me. The problem has a >>>>>>> solution if you know where to look. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am sure that all here want to get a preview of this emerging >>>>>>> solution. Is it possible to reveal to us a preview? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
